Paraphrased, "All you simpletons should give up your SUVs". "I'll keep driving them and live in my 20K Sq Ft home.

Quote:and Edwards, whose convoy is often mini-van centric, had this Cadillac SRX Crossover (15 mpg) beside him in Iowa on his arrival from announcing his candidacy for president in New Orleans, according to his Flickr stream.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0...e_SUV.html


F'n hypocrite. Do any of you libs take this fool seriously?

RebelKev Wrote:Paraphrased, "All you simpletons should give up your SUVs". "I'll keep driving them and live in my 20K Sq Ft home.

Quote:and Edwards, whose convoy is often mini-van centric, had this Cadillac SRX Crossover (15 mpg) beside him in Iowa on his arrival from announcing his candidacy for president in New Orleans, according to his Flickr stream.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0...e_SUV.html


F'n hypocrite. Do any of you libs take this fool seriously?

Can we take any politician seriously?

NIU007 Wrote:Can we take any politician seriously?

Yes. Mark Sanford. The rest? Probably not.

RebelKev Wrote:

NIU007 Wrote:Can we take any politician seriously?

Yes. Mark Sanford. The rest? Probably not.

You forgot Ron Paul. And as much as this will shake you to your core ... Sanford's voting record is the closest recent voting record in all of Congress to Ron Paul's. They were frequently they only people voting for or against bills. In fact, Ron Paul hinted that he wanted Sanford as his VP. That'd be orgasmic ticket right there.

georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:You forgot Ron Paul. And as much as this will shake you to your core ... Sanford's voting record is the closest recent voting record in all of Congress to Ron Paul's. They were frequently they only people voting for or against bills. In fact, Ron Paul hinted that he wanted Sanford as his VP. That'd be orgasmic ticket right there.

One of my arguments with the Paul are that he apparently doesn't think we should protect this country unless it's reactionary.

RebelKev Wrote:One of my arguments with the Paul are that he apparently doesn't think we should protect this country unless it's reactionary.

some blogs you'd probably like:

Ron Pauls former employee: http://libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com
apparently he now has 2 challengers for his congress seat in primary and is mailing out flyers portraying him as a hawk in his district. contridicting his national rhetoric.


http://www.mainstreamlibertarian.com/

apparently Ted Nugent is thinking about running for Gov. of Michigan, I'd pay money to watch the debates.

a new one: Conservatives and Libertarians United against Ron Paul: "Watching what Ron Paul does, not what he says"

right now that one focuses more on the issues and less on the conspiracy theories like the "North American Union", Fed. reserve/fiat currency and accusing the CinC of being "determined to impose Martial Law through devious means, because Iran and other jihadist aren't real threats" type rhetoric. at best, mild trutherism. and also a clear example of not being fit for command.

somehow I doubt Mark Sanford has a 75% NARAL rating