Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Author Message
SO#1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,008
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Connecticut
Location:
Post: #1
Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
There is a quiet revolution afoot in college football. The have-nots may not be storming the gates of the powerful, but they are coming through one and two at a time.

The gates in question guard the BCS bowls, the lucrative (payouts of $14 million to $17 million per team) season-ending games that define success in college football. One season it's Utah. Another it's Boise State and Louisville. This season, it may be TCU or Hawaii.

Given the opportunity, the meek are inheriting the turf.

Boise State's Fiesta Bowl win gave all the have-not teams a reason to celebrate.

• Utah, from the Mountain West Conference, went to the Fiesta Bowl three seasons ago and beat Pittsburgh in a 35-7 rout.

• Louisville crossed over from Conference USA to the Big East, in which it won the 2006 league championship and followed with a 24-13 Orange Bowl victory over Wake Forest.

• Boise State, from the Western Athletic Conference, became the national sweetheart with its 43-42 overtime victory over Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl in January.

They are, really, the most American of stories, or at least the story of America that we like to read to our children, the one in which the little guys rise above the obstacles and succeed.

The odds and the marketplace may be against the Boise States. But with pluck and grit and a little red, white and blue ingenuity, they reach the top anyway. All we're missing is Frank Capra to direct the movie and Jimmy Stewart to star in it: "Mr. Petersen goes to the Fiesta Bowl."


"All we've been asking for is a chance," Boise State coach Chris Petersen said last month. "They give us a chance and we capitalize. Utah did the same thing. But I know there's a handful, more than a handful, of other teams out there that are very close to doing the same thing."


All we've been asking for is a chance. They give us a chance and we capitalize. Utah did the same thing. But I know there's a handful, more than a handful, of other teams out there that are very close to doing the same thing.
Boise State coach Chris Petersen

The chance that Petersen spoke of came in the form of liberalized standards for reaching a BCS game. In the first six years of the BCS, no teams from the nonguaranteed leagues reached the BCS. When members of Congress cleared their throat in the direction of college football and threatened to look into restraint of trade, the conference commissioners responded by (A) adding a fifth BCS bowl, and (B) making it easier to qualify for them.

A champion from a league without a guaranteed bid may qualify for one by finishing in the top 12 of the final BCS standings, or in the top 16 if the team is ranked higher than the champion from a conference with a guaranteed bid. Boise State qualified for the BCS pool last season by finishing eighth in the final BCS standings.

And when the Broncos beat the Sooners, they captured the imagination of the nation. The outpouring of affection has been so overwhelming that Petersen now wishes it would just go away. He refused to answer questions about it in his media conference at the WAC football preview in San Jose, Calif., last month.

"I think we signed kids from nine different states," Petersen said. "Everywhere we would go -- it wasn't just the coaches. It would be the administrators, the secretaries -- everybody wanted to talk about the game. If they knew you coached at Boise State, they wanted to talk about the game. So many of our people in Boise -- friends and boosters and fans -- everybody's got their stories. They go and they wear their Bronco gear, and they're in the Chicago airport, and people will come up to them and talk about the game. We just hear that time and time again.

"You just really appreciate the support and what it does for you, but yeah. … When you start feeling too good about yourself, you're very satisfied with what you've done, there are a lot of people who are gunning for you."


Chris Petersen and the Broncos are reaping the benefits of their BCS win.

WAC commissioner Karl Benson campaigned against the creation of the BCS a decade ago because he feared the six guaranteed-bid conferences would increase the gap between their members and the schools in his league. Benson believes the economic gap has continued to widen. However, he says, the competitive gap is narrowing.

"The allocation of that fifth game was not only to protect the bowls," Benson said, "but to protect the six [guaranteed-bid] conferences. They were expecting that one team would [qualify] on a regular basis."

What's funny about that is most NCAA legislation affecting competitive balance in college football did so at the starting line -- that is, how teams are put together. But scholarship limits (25 per season and 85 overall) remain where they have been for almost 20 years. The change in BCS qualification affected the finish line. There is a greater reward available for the have-nots.

Louisville athletic director Tom Jurich, whose team moved into the Big East in 2005, said he believes that difference is significant. Life in Conference USA proved frustrating for the Cardinals.

"You'd see all these bottom-feeders from major conferences recruiting against you and they'd say, 'Well, we're going to play for the national title,' when we all knew they were never even going to get in the upper half of their own conference," Jurich said. "The best thing we could do is shoot for the Liberty Bowl."


The change in the rule has opened recruiting doors, Benson believes, for the Boise States and Hawaiis.

"The recruits that in the past may not have looked at Boise State, now are," Benson said. "Success breeds success."

They are looking at Boise State -- and Utah and Louisville and the others -- because they have more ways to see them. New media has made a huge difference. Every football program has its own Web site, of course. More important, the expansion of college football to six nights a week on television, plus the streaming of Saturday games on the Internet, has made more schools accessible to recruits.

"When they want us to play Sunday mornings at 2, I'm going to play. … If you want to be a great program, as we aspire to be, you want to be a highly ranked program, you play on the nights that are going to help you," Jurich said. "What that did was get us in homes from a recruiting standpoint. Kids aren't watching games on Saturdays. Weekdays, you have a captive audience."


USF coach Jim Leavitt thinks the more inclusive BCS format gives more teams hope. The change has given the schools in the nonguaranteed conferences hope, says South Florida coach Jim Leavitt. The Bulls, like Louisville, left C-USA for the Big East two years ago.


"That team is still going to have to be undefeated, top 10, whatever, to have a shot," said Leavitt, whose Bulls went 9-4 last season. "It at least gave a crack to all those other 60 schools [from nonguaranteed leagues]."


Brian Kelly, who left Central Michigan in the Mid-American Conference to coach Cincinnati in the Big East in December 2006, echoed Leavitt's sentiments. The prize may be available to more teams, Kelly said, but the chance for any one team to win it remains markedly easier for the schools in the guaranteed conferences.


Kelly explained his reasoning in dollars: Central Michigan came home from the Motor City Bowl with a $75,000 deficit. Cincinnati, which he coached in the International Bowl, came home to find a $1.6 million check from the Big East.


"Does that not mean you can't once in a while have a team pop out? No, I think you definitely can," Kelly said. "But on a consistent basis? Look at Bowling Green."


The Falcons won 37 games in four seasons (2001-2004), the first two under Urban Meyer and the last two under his successor, Gregg Brandon. They have won 10 games over the past two years.


"Bowling Green was beating Big Ten teams left and right three or four years ago," Kelly said. "Gregg Brandon is a heck of a football coach. He didn't just all of a sudden get dumb. But they're nowhere where they were. It's because you can't keep progressing your program because of the lack of the monies. Cincinnati is able to reinvest its dollars into its program. It's a huge disparity.



"It's a little like the Yankees and their ability to free-spend, compared to a small-market team like the Twins that has to develop its talent. You've got to develop your talent in the MAC and hope that can offset the big-market, high-profile guys."


That may be why Southeastern Conference commissioner Mike Slive remains serene in the wake of Boise State's victory.


"I think it's confirmation of the fact that we made the right decision," Slive said. "It was not only good for the BCS, it was not only good for Boise State, but it was good for college football."

Here's the thing about this quiet revolution: By cracking open the door to the postseason, college football enjoyed the same rise in public adulation that college basketball received when it expanded the NCAA Tournament. The allure of March Madness, as any bracketologist can tell you, is in picking the lower seeds that will advance. George Mason, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Kent State and Valparaiso all made college hoops fans swoon.

Never mind that college football only agreed to the change to keep Congress from intervening. March Madness has become part of college football, and the BCS did so without upsetting its economic power structure.

That's not exactly the way Capra would have blocked it out. But the public has given it four stars, anyway.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/preview07/...id=2965756
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2007 03:44 PM by SO#1.)
08-08-2007 09:04 PM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Gray Avenger Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,451
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 744
I Root For: MEMPHIS
Location: Memphis
Post: #2
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
The BCS is a greedy, hypocritical, un-American monopoly.
08-09-2007 10:03 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
MichaelSavage Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,583
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: WVU, Nebraska
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Gray Avenger Wrote:The BCS is a greedy, hypocritical, un-American monopoly.

I agree.
08-09-2007 10:06 AM
Find all posts by this user
Cubanbull Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Just like Haliburton.03-lmfao03-lmfao
08-09-2007 10:06 AM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Tigeer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,526
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: UoM & WVU
Location: Martinsville, VA
Post: #5
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Gray Avenger Wrote:The BCS is a greedy, hypocritical, un-American monopoly.

Run by a bunch of doctors, mostly lawyers, politicians and dirty businessmen that hand out to some that don't deserve shat.
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2007 10:25 AM by Tigeer.)
08-09-2007 10:14 AM
Find all posts by this user
ultraviolet Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,715
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 308
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Kudos to Tom Jurich for the best comment in the whole article ""You'd see all these bottom-feeders from major conferences recruiting against you and they'd say, 'Well, we're going to play for the national title,' when we all knew they were never even going to get in the upper half of their own conference," Jurich said. "The best thing we could do is shoot for the Liberty Bowl."

That sums up the irony of a Duke being able to claim a better shot at a national than a CUSA based Louisville. With no artificial barrier like the BCS process, Duke can't actually say that to a recruit with a straight face.
08-09-2007 10:24 AM
Find all posts by this user
knight_01 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,407
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 1
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Yeah but with greater access and proven non-auto bid teams having made it and won their games, the artificial barrier is going to become non-existent in recruits' minds. If you see a non-auto bid team in a BCS bowl every year, then you know the reality is that all D1a conferences have a realistic shot of sending a team each year. Now as to a team like Duke saying they're gong to win a national championship, that's just pure marketing b.s. and it will wear out quickly with recruits, HS coaches, and parents.
08-09-2007 10:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


L-yes Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,596
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 67
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
ultraviolet Wrote:Kudos to Tom Jurich for the best comment in the whole article ""You'd see all these bottom-feeders from major conferences recruiting against you and they'd say, 'Well, we're going to play for the national title,' when we all knew they were never even going to get in the upper half of their own conference," Jurich said. "The best thing we could do is shoot for the Liberty Bowl."

That sums up the irony of a Duke being able to claim a better shot at a national than a CUSA based Louisville. With no artificial barrier like the BCS process, Duke can't actually say that to a recruit with a straight face.

He was talking about Kentucky.
08-09-2007 10:41 AM
Find all posts by this user
Cubanbull Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,617
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 392
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
knight_01 Wrote:Yeah but with greater access and proven non-auto bid teams having made it and won their games, the artificial barrier is going to become non-existent in recruits' minds. If you see a non-auto bid team in a BCS bowl every year, then you know the reality is that all D1a conferences have a realistic shot of sending a team each year. Now as to a team like Duke saying they're gong to win a national championship, that's just pure marketing b.s. and it will wear out quickly with recruits, HS coaches, and parents.
Not the same shot. You are in the big East you have a 1 in 8 shot at it and one wil go every year.
Those outside of the BCS league have higher odds and are NOT guaranteed a yearly spot.
08-09-2007 10:54 AM
Find all posts by this user
Tigeer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,526
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: UoM & WVU
Location: Martinsville, VA
Post: #10
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Cubanbull Wrote:
knight_01 Wrote:Yeah but with greater access and proven non-auto bid teams having made it and won their games, the artificial barrier is going to become non-existent in recruits' minds. If you see a non-auto bid team in a BCS bowl every year, then you know the reality is that all D1a conferences have a realistic shot of sending a team each year. Now as to a team like Duke saying they're gong to win a national championship, that's just pure marketing b.s. and it will wear out quickly with recruits, HS coaches, and parents.
Not the same shot. You are in the big East you have a 1 in 8 shot at it and one wil go every year.
Those outside of the BCS league have higher odds and are NOT guaranteed a yearly spot.

I am not a true statistics guy but it would depend on your coefficient; I don't believe UConn has as good a chance to get a BCS bid than say WVU.

I would say a team like Boise State, USM, Utah has a much better chance than Duke, Baylor or Vandy, regardless of league.
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2007 11:23 AM by Tigeer.)
08-09-2007 11:21 AM
Find all posts by this user
Advertisement


Capital Pirate Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,550
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 46
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: New Bern, NC

Crappies
Post: #11
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Is there a LINK to this story????? Thanks!
08-09-2007 11:27 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
GunnerFan Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,093
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 14
I Root For: GT, Cuse
Location: Chicken City, GA
Post: #12
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
Gray Avenger Wrote:The BCS is a greedy, hypocritical, un-American monopoly.
Possibly. But the same could be said about the NCAA tourney. And in some ways the reverse is true.

Take away the national title talk. Let's pretend national championships at this level remain an award by 1-3 polls like AP, UPI, etc., and that there is no monetary award tied to the title. The monies earned by conferences are thus based solely on their market appeal. Is that un-American? After all, it was the American judicial system that said the schools and conferences had the right to sell their broadcast rights, and thus enabled the current system we have now.

I agree the BCS is abusing the mythical national championship, but I think people are criticizing a total sum of parts, and some of those parts are wholly legal, marketable and American.
08-09-2007 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user
CatsClaw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,170
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation: 185
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: The land of Winning
Post: #13
RE: Have-nots make headway against BCS haves
True, though people forget one thing about being in a BCS and non-BCS conference. If a BCS team loses a non-conference, or even a conference game, they still have a shot at a BCS bowl by winning the conference. If a non-BCS school loses a game or two there is a very slim chance of them going to a BCS bowl.

I am not a true statistics guy but it would depend on your coefficient; I don't believe UConn has as good a chance to get a BCS bid than say WVU.


UConn has as good a chance as West Virginia or anybody else of getting a BCS bid. Wake Forest showed last year that the favorite doesn't always win the conference.
08-09-2007 03:55 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.