Exposed...

Any more proof needed? He's a phony. Wait 'til you see his portfolio.

I wish someone would... ;-)

griffen Wrote:I wish someone would... ;-)

Me too...

while we are at it, can we get the same hitman to take out hugh hewitt, rosie o'donnell, sean penn, rush limbaugh, and james dobson?

aTxTIGER Wrote:while we are at it, can we get the same hitman to take out hugh hewitt, rosie o'donnell, sean penn, rush limbaugh, and james dobson?

.....Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Neil Boortz, Michael Savage, Charles Krauthammer, Fred Phelps, Rupert Murdoch, Glen Beck, G. Gordon Liddy, Ken Hamblin, Laura Ingraham......

the other Greg Childers Wrote:.....Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Neil Boortz, Michael Savage, Charles Krauthammer, Fred Phelps, Rupert Murdoch, Glen Beck, G. Gordon Liddy, Ken Hamblin, Laura Ingraham......

Fred Phelps is a Democrat. Sorry to break your little, Communist-red heart.

Also, Boortz is a Libertarian. He disagrees with the Republicans on EVERYTHING Social. Again, sorry to break your Communist-red heart.

As the old saying goes, don't wish death on them, just wish that they're caught with a dead girl or a live boy.

EastStang Wrote:As the old saying goes, don't wish death on them, just wish that they're caught with a dead girl or a live boy.

but why wish death on some girl?

BTW, Phelps is a democrat because its easier to get on the ballot as a Dem in Kansas than the repubs. im sure if you ask him personally, you'll get an answer worthy of the cat lady on the simpsons.

aTxTIGER Wrote:but why wish death on some girl?

BTW, Phelps is a democrat because its easier to get on the ballot as a Dem in Kansas than the repubs. im sure if you ask him personally, you'll get an answer worthy of the cat lady on the simpsons.

...so, Dems you don't like you just say they're "Repubs"? Hell, we can play that game all day long.

I wouldn't really wish death on some girl, but if she's with Michael Moore....

i wasnt saying he was a repub either. i was saying that he is just some crazy kook who isnt either a dem or a repub...only that he has chosen the path of least resistance in his political affiliation. the dems shouldnt be proud of that.

RebelKev Wrote:

the other Greg Childers Wrote:.....Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Neil Boortz, Michael Savage, Charles Krauthammer, Fred Phelps, Rupert Murdoch, Glen Beck, G. Gordon Liddy, Ken Hamblin, Laura Ingraham......

Fred Phelps is a Democrat. Sorry to break your little, Communist-red heart.

Also, Boortz is a Libertarian. He disagrees with the Republicans on EVERYTHING Social. Again, sorry to break your Communist-red heart.

Which goes to show how ignorant you really are.

Fred Phelps may have run for office in the Democratic primary in his state, but he's pretty much against anyone he believes supports gay rights. He adamantly opposed Bill & Hillary Clinton and Al Gore for their support of gay rights.

Boortz disagrees with Democrats on EVERYTHING economic. He also supports the war in Iraq, he disagrees that global climate change is caused by human activity, he favors lowering taxes and shrinking the size of the government, and he is opposed to unrestricted immigration.

RebelKev, it would really help your case if you'd do just a little research before you embarrass yourself with your ignorant comments.

the other Greg Childers Wrote:RebelKev, it would really help your case if you'd do just a little research before you embarrass yourself with your ignorant comments.

Maybe you should take your own advice....

P.S. I showed you "how". I thought you were going to take care of some business....

the other Greg Childers Wrote:Which goes to show how ignorant you really are.

Fred Phelps may have run for office in the Democratic primary in his state, but he's pretty much against anyone he believes supports gay rights. He adamantly opposed Bill & Hillary Clinton and Al Gore for their support of gay rights.

Boortz disagrees with Democrats on EVERYTHING economic. He also supports the war in Iraq, he disagrees that global climate change is caused by human activity, he favors lowering taxes and shrinking the size of the government, and he is opposed to unrestricted immigration.

RebelKev, it would really help your case if you'd do just a little research before you embarrass yourself with your ignorant comments.

Riiiigghhhttttttt.t, Greg, you f'n idiot. And I only say that because you said "I" was ignorant with NOTHING, as usual, to back it up. Gay rights? Al Gore? Check out this link, Pumpkin:

http://www.lcrga.com/archive/200010251159.shtml

Boortz disagrees with everything economic? Hell, I do as well, but I'm fairly socially liberal. I'm assuming you are for INcreasing the size of government and unrestricted immigration, since you made them points in your hatred for Boortz. I'm also for lowering taxes. Worked wonders for the economy when Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush did it, didn't it?

You know, this gets me thinking, you're about the only idiot on this site that doesn't provide links to back up his/her dumb*** claims. Do you bleat as well?

Phelps is a Democrat. Suck on it.

why do you get my hopes up with a title like that?

RebelKev Wrote:Also, Boortz is a Libertarian. He disagrees with the Republicans on EVERYTHING Social. Again, sorry to break your Communist-red heart.

But I have heard Boortz say some unflattering things of Ron Paul when it comes to Iraq/military.

But Boortz has 2 strikes against him:

1. He is a Texas Aggie
2. He is a lawyer.

WMD Owl Wrote:But Boortz has 2 strikes against him:

1. He is a Texas Aggie
2. He is a lawyer.

Somehow Aggie and Libertarian don't seem to go together. Kind of like cultist and skeptic.

I45owl Wrote:Somehow Aggie and Libertarian don't seem to go together. Kind of like cultist and skeptic.

WMD Owl Wrote:But I have heard Boortz say some unflattering things of Ron Paul when it comes to Iraq/military.

What does that have to do with anything? Being for the war is somehow anti-libertarian? Paul has a lot of great points, but when it comes to national defense, sorry, he's just not being realistic. Yeah, we can look to the past, and at errors made, but it doesn't change the present situation. Now, if the good Doc wants to build a time machine out of a DeLorean and go back in time to try to rectify a few things, hey, he can knock himself out.

WMD Owl Wrote:But I have heard Boortz say some unflattering things of Ron Paul when it comes to Iraq/military.

What does that have to do with anything? Being for the war is somehow anti-libertarian? Paul has a lot of great points, but when it comes to national defense, sorry, he's just not being realistic. Yeah, we can look to the past, and at errors made, but it doesn't change the present situation. Now, if the good Doc wants to build a time machine out of a DeLorean and go back in time to try to rectify a few things, hey, he can knock himself out.