CollegeCard Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:

bearcatfan Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:On paper, I don't think UC would be that likely to bump one of those top 4.....it would probably be Pitt if anyone.

On paper, UC lost to Rutgers and USF last year. In reality, they beat both of them handily.

I thought that proved more or less that the Big East is overrated....

WVU, Louisville, Rutgers....you are talking schools that have never been #1 before, in fact never ranked higher than #3.......

That doesn't even come close to making sense, but does show your anti-UC MAC sentiment and jealousy.

As for not being ranked #1, I'm fairly certain being ranked #3 puts you right there in the running at that top. And WVU has played in a title game within the last 20 years.

not a true 1 vs. 2 title game.......wvu was only ranked #3

These days you have to be ranked #2 or better

Kit-Cat Wrote:

CollegeCard Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:

bearcatfan Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:On paper, I don't think UC would be that likely to bump one of those top 4.....it would probably be Pitt if anyone.

On paper, UC lost to Rutgers and USF last year. In reality, they beat both of them handily.

I thought that proved more or less that the Big East is overrated....

WVU, Louisville, Rutgers....you are talking schools that have never been #1 before, in fact never ranked higher than #3.......

That doesn't even come close to making sense, but does show your anti-UC MAC sentiment and jealousy.

As for not being ranked #1, I'm fairly certain being ranked #3 puts you right there in the running at that top. And WVU has played in a title game within the last 20 years.

not a true 1 vs. 2 title game.......wvu was only ranked #3

These days you have to be ranked #2 or better

If WVU had won the game, they were national champs. As it is, you're reduced to arguing technicalities. As I said, your original point was no point at all. Jealousy isn't becoming.

bearcatfan Wrote:

CatsClaw Wrote:But you'll never make people completely happy. UC had 28,000 for the Rutgers game and Big East fans were complaining that it "looked empty".

To be fair -- I was at the game, and early on, there was not 28,000 there. I think the OSU bandwagon fans were slow to make there way to Nippert. It filled up a lot more after halftime.

I was at the game as well, and you're exactly right.

Kit-Cat Wrote:

bitcruncher Wrote:Hey, I'd like to see them become a good team. Maybe it would draw some fans into the stadium. The views of the empty seats on TV doesn't look good for the BEast.

If UC ends up being a top 25 team, the question is who are they going to replace?

With only 8 schools, mathematically, it is almost impossible for them to have more the 4 in the top 25.......

Right now you have WVU, Louisville, Rutgers, USF?

On paper, I don't think UC would be that likely to bump one of those top 4.....it would probably be Pitt if anyone.

Why is it impossible to have 5 ranked teams? And why couldn't UC bump Rutgers or USF? Until last year Rutgers and USF weren't even ranked, so it's not like they're staples in the Top 25. Besides, last year UC finished 4th, including beating USF and Rutgers and almost Louisville, so explain how it's impossible for UC to be ranked in the Top 25?

Kit-Cat Wrote:

CollegeCard Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:

bearcatfan Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:On paper, I don't think UC would be that likely to bump one of those top 4.....it would probably be Pitt if anyone.

On paper, UC lost to Rutgers and USF last year. In reality, they beat both of them handily.

I thought that proved more or less that the Big East is overrated....

WVU, Louisville, Rutgers....you are talking schools that have never been #1 before, in fact never ranked higher than #3.......

That doesn't even come close to making sense, but does show your anti-UC MAC sentiment and jealousy.

As for not being ranked #1, I'm fairly certain being ranked #3 puts you right there in the running at that top. And WVU has played in a title game within the last 20 years.

not a true 1 vs. 2 title game.......wvu was only ranked #3

These days you have to be ranked #2 or better

And these days being ranked #3 puts you in position to get a title shot. Florida was #3 until the last day.

CatsClaw Wrote:

Fanatical Wrote:

bitcruncher Wrote:Like I said... if only they can reach such heights.

consider yourself lucky that you'll get the opportunity to see it happen

Or possibly unlucky.

Don't start dreams of fantasy you can't back up...

Kit-Cat Wrote:With only 8 schools, mathematically, it is almost impossible for them to have more the 4 in the top 25.......

Tell that to the SEC.

Kit-Cat Wrote:

bearcatfan Wrote:

Kit-Cat Wrote:On paper, I don't think UC would be that likely to bump one of those top 4.....it would probably be Pitt if anyone.

On paper, UC lost to Rutgers and USF last year. In reality, they beat both of them handily.

I thought that proved more or less that the Big East is overrated....

WVU, Louisville, Rutgers....you are talking schools that have never been #1 before, in fact never ranked higher than #3.......

Your first problem was thinking. You should avoid it at all costs because it will only lead you into trouble. You've already shown you are incapable of intelligent thought. Of course he won't admit it. The worst thing you can do to a moron is question their intelligence.

Now I think I will relegate this fool to the same status as TS2 - non-person.