Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Christian right labors to find '08 candidate
Author Message
OUGwave Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,172
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 146
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #81
 
Endzone2 Wrote:
OUGwave Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:I've been hit on a lot by homos and I don't like it.

Interesting. I live in DC, where probably 15% of the population is gay, and I can't say for sure if I've ever been hit on.

I wonder why you keep getting hit on.

Because I am way way better looking than you dude. ;-)

Well, thats probably what the guys tell you, but thats just pillow talk.
02-28-2007 03:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Endzone2 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,297
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Miami Redhawks
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Post: #82
 
Back in the mid 80's to early 90's there were 7's, 8's 9's & occasional 10's out on the strips in Dallas and Ft. Worth every night of the week. At times there were 15 to 20 girls out at one time. IMHO the most beautiful women in the world live right here in the DFW Metroplex. I've been told this by other people who have moved here from other places. The thing is though is that this lifestyle is a horrendous waste of time and money. It is impossible to get the kind of intimacy that a man and woman have in a good marriage relationship. In fact you could have a billion one-night stands with perfect 10's, and it would not be as satisfying as a GOOD relationship between a married couple. I am completely and totally burned out on this garbage, and I have been with the most gorgeous women God ever created. It also is a wide open door to being attacked by demonic spirits. I get very sick for about 2 weeks after it happens and things happen in the spirit realm that I don't think most any of you would understand. It also opens the door to a spirit of whoredom (wanting any and every woman) and that is a hinderance to a good healthy relationship. If I had it to do over again, I would remain a virgin. I was a virgin until I was 28, but I decided I needed to make up for lost time and that was a very bad decision. I hope married men on this board will cherish their wife and realize this is God's design. I'm not exaggerating when I say I've been with 350 different women and since I've been to all 7 continents (and I was a sailor boy) I've been in different whore houses all over the world too. But about 300 of the women I met in the DFW area. What were those girls real names and where are they now? I have no idea except for 1 or 2 women and I have no desire to stay in touch with them. There were no friendships formed, no good thing that came out of it. Only a longing for what it might of been like to have had a good relationship with some of them and not just the illicit sex which is impossible to build a good relationship on. This kind of lifestyle leads to total emptiness in relationships with women, and it is not worth it.
02-28-2007 03:44 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #83
 
Endzone2 Wrote:Thank you. I guess that wasn't as difficult as everybody else made it out to be. IMHO it was still a very logical question to ask though.

Only in your warped mind.
02-28-2007 08:20 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Bourgeois_Rage Away
That guy!
*

Posts: 6,965
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 106
I Root For: UC & Bushmills
Location:

Folding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGDonatorsDonators
Post: #84
 
Endzone2 Wrote:Thank you. I guess that wasn't as difficult as everybody else made it out to be. IMHO it was still a very logical question to ask though.

Yeah, if you still believe that, it is because you have no idea why I asked this question:
Quote:So you are actually saying that the validity of the argument can rise or fall based on who is presenting it?
Let me give you an of examples why this is not so.

A doctored mathematician says, "1 + 1 = 2." A first grader makes the exact same statement.

You would say that the mathematician's statement holds more water because of his background. I (and most others on here) say that the trueness of the statement is independent of the credentials of the speaker.

Granted, common sense should cause you to question the conclusions. You may say that a first grader is much more likely to make a mathematical mistake than a math expert. But you should evaluate those conclusions not by examining who is saying them, but by the argument itself. The trueness of the argument does not change due to the identity of the person saying it.

Secondly, If I say the Earth is shaped like a coffee mug, my credentials do not change the reality of the shape of the Earth. My credentials may go to explaining why I am right or wrong, but they do not change the logical conclusions. If I say that I have no formal training, you may say that I am just ignorant about the shape of the Earth. If I am a Geologist you made being to question my sanity. But argument is not affected by my background.

That is why one does not have to be gay to argue for homosexuals, and they do not have to be straight to argue against them. We all have different motivations, but the arguments rise and fall on their own merits.
02-28-2007 08:46 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #85
 
Bourgeois_Rage Wrote:That is why one does not have to be gay to argue for homosexuals, and they do not have to be straight to argue against them. We all have different motivations, but the arguments rise and fall on their own merits.

Jews would have been screwed if everyone thought like EndZone.
02-28-2007 08:47 AM
Quote this message in a reply
OUGwave Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,172
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 146
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #86
 
Bourgeois_Rage Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:Thank you. I guess that wasn't as difficult as everybody else made it out to be. IMHO it was still a very logical question to ask though.

Yeah, if you still believe that, it is because you have no idea why I asked this question:
Quote:So you are actually saying that the validity of the argument can rise or fall based on who is presenting it?
Let me give you an of examples why this is not so.

A doctored mathematician says, "1 + 1 = 2." A first grader makes the exact same statement.

You would say that the mathematician's statement holds more water because of his background. I (and most others on here) say that the trueness of the statement is independent of the credentials of the speaker.

Granted, common sense should cause you to question the conclusions. You may say that a first grader is much more likely to make a mathematical mistake than a math expert. But you should evaluate those conclusions not by examining who is saying them, but by the argument itself. The trueness of the argument does not change due to the identity of the person saying it.

Secondly, If I say the Earth is shaped like a coffee mug, my credentials do not change the reality of the shape of the Earth. My credentials may go to explaining why I am right or wrong, but they do not change the logical conclusions. If I say that I have no formal training, you may say that I am just ignorant about the shape of the Earth. If I am a Geologist you made being to question my sanity. But argument is not affected by my background.

That is why one does not have to be gay to argue for homosexuals, and they do not have to be straight to argue against them. We all have different motivations, but the arguments rise and fall on their own merits.

Or, the much better example...

Do I have to be former slave to argue that slavery is wrong? Do I have to be black to argue that Jim Crow segregation was wrong? No. These arguments have the same merits regardless of who is presenting them.
02-28-2007 09:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Endzone2 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,297
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Miami Redhawks
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Post: #87
 
It is quite possible that someone who advocates for homo marriages is in fact gay. As you have pointed out, this may not necessarily be the case. However, it is certainly possible--far more possible than if someone doesn't think it is acceptable. Hence my questions which was a valid questions.

What none of you want to admit is that if somebody thinks homo marriages are O.K., then why not for them too? In a way you make yourselves look like fools. You say a certain type of behavior is alright (homo marriages) but then you distance yourselves from it and say "I would never have anything to do with that man". It seems to me you're kind of making yourselves with foolish by taking this position.
02-28-2007 01:19 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #88
 
Endzone2 Wrote:What none of you want to admit is that if somebody thinks homo marriages are O.K., then why not for them too? In a way you make yourselves look like fools. You say a certain type of behavior is alright (homo marriages) but then you distance yourselves from it and say "I would never have anything to do with that man". It seems to me you're kind of making yourselves with foolish by taking this position.

Good God. I was thinking deeper than that by the 5th grade.

How's this, it doesn't MATTER what we think as it's none of our f'n business what CITIZENS do when it doesn't affect you. ...and no, it doesn't affect you.

Hey, were you one of the subjects of that gay porn study?
02-28-2007 01:24 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Bourgeois_Rage Away
That guy!
*

Posts: 6,965
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 106
I Root For: UC & Bushmills
Location:

Folding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGDonatorsDonators
Post: #89
 
Endzone2 Wrote:It is quite possible that someone who advocates for homo marriages is in fact gay. As you have pointed out, this may not necessarily be the case. However, it is certainly possible--far more possible than if someone doesn't think it is acceptable. Hence my questions which was a valid questions.
No. You continue to fail to demonstrate why your question was valid. Yes, the arguer may be gay. Why do you have to know? You don't.
Quote:What none of you want to admit is that if somebody thinks homo marriages are O.K., then why not for them too? In a way you make yourselves look like fools. You say a certain type of behavior is alright (homo marriages) but then you distance yourselves from it and say "I would never have anything to do with that man". It seems to me you're kind of making yourselves with foolish by taking this position.
The only one who is being foolish is you. Well maybe we are too, for thinking that you understand basic rules of logic and the fallacies that you are employing.
02-28-2007 01:30 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Endzone2 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,297
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Miami Redhawks
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Post: #90
 
RebelKev Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:What none of you want to admit is that if somebody thinks homo marriages are O.K., then why not for them too? In a way you make yourselves look like fools. You say a certain type of behavior is alright (homo marriages) but then you distance yourselves from it and say "I would never have anything to do with that man". It seems to me you're kind of making yourselves with foolish by taking this position.

Good God. I was thinking deeper than that by the 5th grade.

How's this, it doesn't MATTER what we think as it's none of our f'n business what CITIZENS do when it doesn't affect you. ...and no, it doesn't affect you.

Hey, were you one of the subjects of that gay porn study?

Did you answer my question in the other thread about being a potty mouth? Let me go check. I forget what thread that was in.
02-28-2007 01:30 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #91
 
Endzone2 Wrote:Did you answer my question in the other thread about being a potty mouth? Let me go check. I forget what thread that was in.

Sure I did, porn addict.
02-28-2007 01:35 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Endzone2 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,297
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Miami Redhawks
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Post: #92
 
RebelKev Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:Did you answer my question in the other thread about being a potty mouth? Let me go check. I forget what thread that was in.

Sure I did, porn addict.

What was that another poster told me about making judgments?

I hate porn and openly condemn it. I war against it and I am overcoming it. But, you OTOH seem to enjoy the garbage that pours out of your mind onto my computer screen. Big difference wouldn't you say?
02-28-2007 01:41 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #93
 
Endzone2 Wrote:
RebelKev Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:Did you answer my question in the other thread about being a potty mouth? Let me go check. I forget what thread that was in.

Sure I did, porn addict.

What was that another poster told me about making judgments?

How was I passing judgement? You TOLD us you were a porn addict. I'm not allowed to quote you now? 01-wingedeagle
02-28-2007 01:49 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.