http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...007/261345

He'd be a dead man.

...just sayin'.

Funny article...

speaking of: Which right wing poster hasn't been around lately?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007...rrori.html

ccs178 Wrote:http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...007/261345

I would guess most of them since most have been banned for expressing viewpoints other than the conservative viewpoint. Frankly, I am surprised I have not been :banned: yet. ;-)

RobertN Wrote:

ccs178 Wrote:http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...007/261345

I would guess most of them since most have been banned for expressing viewpoints other than the conservative viewpoint. Frankly, I am surprised I have not been :banned: yet. ;-)

Most? Name some.

Who's been banned, Robert? You claim most, so I'm expecting more than a couple of examples. You can't come on here and make those allegations without backing it up with evidence.

Klutz Dio and Oddball would be two. There hasn't been alot to talk about lately. I'm waiting for Scooter to get twenty years to life then I'll post again. Then you'll have the "Baghdad Bobs" of the world saying Scooter did nothing and Cheney wasn't knee deep in the Shite stuff from the very beginning. It's almost depressing.

Machiavelli Wrote:Klutz Dio and Oddball would be two.

Klutz Dio....Was he banned? I can't remember that far back.

Oddball...was banned, but not for expressing a liberal opinion, but for how he expressed that opinion.

JBR...was banned when he decided to "lose it" and dare everyone to ban him.

Now let's list the righties that I have warned and for the most part they didn't over-react and thus have not been banned.

Sherman & Grant
RebelKev
Endzone2

The Klutzman was BANNNED!!!!!!!

Machiavelli Wrote:The Klutzman was BANNNED!!!!!!!

Why?

Out of Klutz and JBR, one was banned and the other went totally f'n nuts due to it.

The only two people I have banned here were one of those two, can't remember which one was actually banned because I don't spend my time worrying about it, and WingedEagle. WingedEagle because he totally went off on me in a post I made congratulating his team for a great win. If you somehow missed that exchange, well, let's just say it wasn't pretty. GTS reinstated him and he started in on GTS, calling HIM a Nazi, etc. Trust me, we had the support of the USM guys on that one. Big mistake on his part. He was real big into internet threats. Sooooo, I've banned 2 people in 4 years. Gee, some Nazi I am, ain't I? As for political issues, etc., there should be NO one here that can't say I'm not fair. I like a good fight. I love to debate. Yes, I can throw the same **** as everyone else, which is WHY I have recused myself from any mod responsibilities and appointed mods that I, and the rest of the administration, viewed as somewhat "moderate". When there is an issue that needs Admin interaction, I try to help. If I feel it would be a conflict of interest, I grab someone else. There was an issue in the past with the moderation on this forum. BR brought up some valid points to which he was promoted to moderator. I have told every mod in this section to PM me if I'm out of line. I like it that way. I'm not a Nazi.

RobertN Wrote:

ccs178 Wrote:http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...007/261345

I would guess most of them since most have been banned for expressing viewpoints other than the conservative viewpoint. Frankly, I am surprised I have not been :banned: yet. ;-)

LOL! The succession of points in this post are hilarious.

Lefty, who can still post here, claims other lefties can no longer post here b/c they are lefties, then acknowledges he can still post, despite being a lefty.

In just 2 sentences robert al-N sums up just why the left in this country are so very pitiful.

Priceless. lmfao lmfao

OUGwave Wrote:Funny article...

speaking of: Which right wing poster hasn't been around lately?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007...rrori.html

You libs love that abcnews. Pretty unbiased source, I know it when I look to the left and see Cheney's picture and Libby below him and the Headline saying Is Cheney next?

I also think it's pretty funny that you find Alleged or Allegedly all throughout that article. Of course I guess you think Alleged means guilty. Plus use common since, why would a terrorist supporter want to support the Republicans. Just think about it, you know OBL was Bill's #1 fan.

Ninerballin Wrote:

OUGwave Wrote:Funny article...

speaking of: Which right wing poster hasn't been around lately?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007...rrori.html

You libs love that abcnews. Pretty unbiased source, I know it when I look to the left and see Cheney's picture and Libby below him and the Headline saying Is Cheney next?

I also think it's pretty funny that you find Alleged or Allegedly all throughout that article.

Hahahaha. Who cares what the damn news source is? The guy was indicted and charged, thats not exactly a subjective statement, is it? Its a fact.

Ok, ok, ok....Here, if it makes you feel better:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253078,00.html

And no, I don't think alleged means guilty. I'm a supporter of due process, and habeas corpus. I hope he gets a full trial, unlike the administration who has said that habeas corpus only exists at their discretion.

Quote:Of course I guess you think Alleged means guilty. Plus use common since, why would a terrorist supporter want to support the Republicans. Just think about it, you know OBL was Bill's #1 fan.

Um, its called pay-to-play in Washington... if you want to have influence, you donate to the party that has power, not the party that doesn't? Makes perfect sense.

Further, why do you assume that terrorists support the democrats? I'd suggest not, considering that 5+ years after 9/11 and Bush still has not only not lifted a finger to capture him, he's actually started an ill-concieved and bungled war that has helped him win a new legion of recruits around the world.

Oh, and the numbers kind of bear this out. Iraq has been a boon for Islamic Terrorism. Some very respected scholars, including Peter Bergen (who wrote the definitive work on bin Laden far before 9/11 ever happened) have crunched the numbers and indicated that global islamic terrorism is up seven-fold since the Iraq war began, and even if you factor out Iraq and Afghanistan-based attacks, you're still looking at a 35% increase.

You can find the article here, the numbers don't lie. Bergen and Cruickshank were very conservative in which data points they included.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex...ect_1.html