georgia_tech_swagger
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">code:</font><hr /><pre style="font-size:x-small; font-family: monospace;">1. Duke Could be unbelievable, depending on frosh.
2. Virginia Transfer Todd Billet sets Roger Mason free.
3. Maryland Gary Williams won't let them drop too far.
4. Georgia Tech Stud freshmen join stud sophomores.
5. Wake Forest Versatile freshman class joins Josh Howard.
6. N.C. State Must replace two senior guards.
7. North Carolina If frosh are ready, could finish 4th.
8. Clemson Tony Stockman's transfer really hurts.
9. Florida State Good luck, coach Hamilton. </pre><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/sports/2987175.htm" target="_blank">Source: Charlotte.com</a>
|
|
04-03-2002 01:12 PM |
|
JD Heel
Unregistered
|
Hey -- I've got an idea! Let's post preseason predictions a day after the season ends!
Truth is, nobody even knows who will be playing next year. Our roster seems to be pretty firm now, but who knows. I love how Georgia Tech's and Wake's freshman classes are "versatile" and "stud"... and ours apparently could be good or could suck. I would take our stud sophomore and freshmen classes over Tech's anyday. But, that's just me.
A lot will happen between now and the season. I'll be surprised if we finish that low, though....
-JD
|
|
04-04-2002 04:39 AM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
We will finish higher than 7th, mark it down.
|
|
04-05-2002 09:49 PM |
|
nate jonesacc
Unregistered
|
I mean if you finished 7th in the conference this year, you should at least be 6th at worst next year. Top 3 recruiting class, weaker ACC, more seasoned players, Jawad as a soph, etc.... The only downside is losing your top 2 scorers and rebounders.
|
|
04-07-2002 11:38 AM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Malaysak1982:
Where is a website that would have UNC's schedule for next year? I would like to see it before I make my predictions. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I don't believe it has been released yet.
|
|
04-07-2002 07:50 PM |
|
nate jonesacc
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Malaysak1982:
Other than UM, why would you think the ACC would be weaker? <img border="0" alt="[girl]" title="" src="graemlins/girl.gif" /> With the influx of talent it should be stronger.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Maryland should be down. Wake should be down. State should be down. Clemson and FSU will stay down. Duke, UVA and GT are the only ones with improvements.
|
|
04-07-2002 08:30 PM |
|
hoops13
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by nate jonesacc:
Duke, UVA and GT are the only ones with improvements.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">UNC has improvements too, we couldn't have a worse season.
<small>[ April 07, 2002, 09:41 PM: Message edited by: hoops13 ]</small>
|
|
04-07-2002 08:40 PM |
|