Liberal Democrats Everywhere are shivering in their boots at their already weak prospects of Election Year 2004....Known Democrat Dan Rather puts the spin on it "But Bin Laden is still at Large"...

If you dont think this is a HUGE political boost to Bush then your head is in the sand...David Gregory on NBC National news said "This is a DEFINING moment for George Bush and it squashes all the critism by Democrats against him." Hear that, you commie leftists? All you assbags can pack your bags and go home now...Clark, Dean, Gebhardt....HEY! See ya! Bush will win in a landslide!

Although most any True American today is Happy as im sure MOST Democrats are..BUT you know that this has to hurt any possible chance the Dems had at capturing the White House....It is amusing to hear the spin of some Liberals today...Dan Rather is already at it...And a Berkely Newspaper did NOT even report it.....Every other paper i checked Nationwide had it Front Page news....

I'm sure that the WMD's, Bin Laden and a justification for our first preemptive war are right behind. :wave:

Emme Effing Herd fan Wrote:Double-U wins in a landslide

LOL!!!!!!!

Bush didn't even win the 2000 election, losing by over 500,000 votes and having to be appointed by the pub Supreme Court after his brother and cronies tried to steal Florida.

It is unlikely that the American people would be stupid enough to elect him this time either....in other words, JUST SAY NO MOE BUSH.

How does tracking down one of our own mad dogs equate to a landslide election for Bush?

It was already inevitable. This just pushed it over the top.

Do the clowns from the left really believe that they can unseed the president with Howard Dean or Wesley Clark? :roflol: :wave:

I wouldn't count Dean out just yet. . .




We have a winner
Molly Ivins - Creators Syndicate
12.04.03 - AUSTIN, Texas -- No one has been waiting with bated breath for me to make up my mind about the Democratic presidential candidates, but I have, and you might be interested in how I got there. I'm for Howard Dean -- because he's going to win.

Dawson Wrote:

Emme Effing Herd fan Wrote:Double-U wins in a landslide

LOL!!!!!!!

Bush didn't even win the 2000 election, losing by over 500,000 votes and having to be appointed by the pub Supreme Court after his brother and cronies tried to steal Florida.

It is unlikely that the American people would be stupid enough to elect him this time either....in other words, JUST SAY NO MOE BUSH.

Will someone please explain the electoral college and the election process to this person. I have grown tired of trying to educate the slow.

The electoral college didn't have anything to do with fraudulent votes in Florida, Kev. Do I keep have to re-explain the election to you, Einstein?

While you're considering how to worm your way out of those facts, why not answer the question I posed above?

How does capturing Saddam make King George a lock in '04?

"But Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, cautioned the capture likely will not end the insurgent attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq. U.S. officials were wary of retaliatory strikes.


``Given the location and circumstances of his capture, it makes it clear that Saddam was not managing the insurgency, and that he had very little control or influence. That is significant and disturbing because it means the insurgents are not fighting for Saddam, they're fighting against the United States,'' said Rockefeller, D-W.Va.

joebordenrebel Wrote:The electoral college didn't have anything to do with fraudulent votes in Florida, Kev. Do I keep have to re-explain the election to you, Einstein?

While you're considering how to worm your way out of those facts, why not answer the question I posed above?

How does capturing Saddam make King George a lock in '04?

1st, you can't explain it to me. Show me the thousands of dienfrenchfried voters that were denied votes. There were people denied and they were felons. Gore DID try to cast aside military absentee ballots.

2nd, why is he a lock? Everything Bush said he was going to do, he has done. The country is becoming VERY prosperous these days and if a high-taxing Demo would have been in office after 9/11 we'd have seen another depression. So I ask again, who will be the Democratic sacrificial lamb in '04?

BTW, if a Demo had a chance at ALL, thunderthies would be in the race. That much is certain. Her blatant thirst for power is ever-so present.

Quote:1st, you can't explain it to me. Show me the thousands of dienfrenchfried voters that were denied votes. There were people denied and they were felons. Gore DID try to cast aside military absentee ballots.

I've showed you at least three or four articles that documents the obvious abuses by the Florida Banana Republic. Do I have to reprove the same arguments every time they come up? Gulf War Syndrome affecting your short term, buddy?

Quote:2nd, why is he a lock? Everything Bush said he was going to do, he has done. The country is becoming VERY prosperous these days and if a high-taxing Demo would have been in office after 9/11 we'd have seen another depression. So I ask again, who will be the Democratic sacrificial lamb in '04?

The country is becoming VERY prosperous? Do you know how preposterous that assertion is? Bush is going back and revising history by rearranging numbers. Most folks I know (out here in the real world) are hurting worse than ever. And the 5% borrowing of total GDP is a house of cards that will fall soon. I'll explain more when I have the time.

BTW, why are y'all so obsessed with the Clintons? Are you hating on Mr. Wooden? And if so, why? If he's so obviously a loser, then why even waste the energy to disparage his name at every turn?

I'll explain the Electoral College Process.

This process was put into effect when America first became a country because the country's leaders were worried that the poorly educated Americans would vote wrong, so they'd have other people do the voting instead. So really, we vote for no reason at all. Oh well, Democracy was getting old anyway.This is one reason I don't vote, or rarely get involved with American Politics. It's really just a bunch of old fat whote guys talking bull****. And the undereducated American public votes for whoever promises world domination. Not that it matters, of course. Because of what I explained. The Electoral College Conspiracy.

Get used to it. The Bush Dynasty has just begun and won't leave until World War III is over. Sooner or later the rest of the world will get sick of this dumb redneck hick.

How's your 401k? End of the "economic recovery" story.

My 401 is in great shape! I take the time to control it. I guess those dumb redneck hicks cannot. :laugh: BTW, that would be President Bush. Get over it. :wave:

rickheel Wrote:My 401 is in great shape! I take the time to control it. I guess those dumb redneck hicks cannot. :laugh: BTW, that would be President Bush. Get over it. :wave:

Mine was fine too. ....until I lost my military contract and cashed it in at 250% of what I put in to it. GO Bush! If there WAS a chance of a Dem being elected, thunder thighs would be in the race. Simple as that.

As a disclaimer, I'll say that I think it is wonderful that Saddam Hussein is in our custody. I say this for various reasons but most notably, the war may be over or the beginning of the end is in sight. Afterall, Bush and Rumsfeld and the other warmongers told us that Saddam was behind the insurrection. If this is true, then we have the guerilla leader and the warring insurgents in the field will be ineffectual at causing violence now. So we as Americans should rejoice the news we heard yesterday, that Saddam was captured. Now we can get his WMD's so we Americans can be safe again. Rejoice!

That being said, I think the fact that W's approval ratings shot up 10% in one day shows exactly how stupid Americans are. Either (A) they can't answer a poll question with authority, or (B) they actually think George W. Bush rooted around in the earth and dug Saddam up. No, niether is the case. Poll questions are invalid if anything and George W. doesn't do anything that would require physical exertion.

I don't understand it. Saddam being captured does not mean that George Bush is a good president. Actually, he's a rather bad president for waging a preemptive war against a nation that was not a threat! As long as we controlled 70% of the airspace of Iraq (as we did before March of 03) Saddam wasn't going to lift a finger to attack either the U.S. or Kuwait or Israel!

Saddam's capture does not mean that George W. Bush will not wage war against other nations or it does absolutely nothing to change the fact that 92% of my income goes to insurance premiums! This is an outrage.

Neocons don't get it but this is the deal:
America is broken. We live in a country that has problems as great as our greatness. Yet we do nothing to solve our problems. We attack and wage war thinking that will solve our problems but that really won't help. It just makes others angry at us and in a way, since we aren't focusing on our internal problems, war serves as a hindrance to us focusing on the real issues that plague our nation.

So ask yourself, do you want a broken America or do you want a country in which 92% of your income doesn't go to insurance companies! Are you with me? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbour?
Germans?
Forget he's rolling....!