<a href='http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html</a>

To hell with Mexico, let their economy drown. They can eat dirt for all I care.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

RebelKev Wrote:<a href='http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html</a>

To hell with Mexico, let their economy drown. They can eat dirt for all I care.

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

American humanitarianism at its best, Kev! :D

No wonder why other nations love us.

KlutzDio I Wrote:

RebelKev Wrote:<a href='http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,111128,00.html</a>

To hell with Mexico, let their economy drown. They can eat dirt for all I care.

:mad:&nbsp; :mad:&nbsp; :mad:&nbsp; :mad:&nbsp; :mad:&nbsp; :mad:

American humanitarianism at its best, Kev! :D

No wonder why other nations love us.

:stupid:

Typical liberal response--BEND OVER AND TAKE IT!

Of course, it worked really well for France back in WW2!

Who are you callling liberal, me or Kev?

Take what?

What about France? You mean we haven't bombed them yet? What gives? Ah, Bush must be a softie! :D

Your post made about as much sense as a stick!

KlutzDio I Wrote:Who are you callling liberal, me or Kev?

Take what?

What about France? You mean we haven't bombed them yet? What gives? Ah, Bush must be a softie! :D

Your post made about as much sense as a stick!

:stupid:

Check out where the sign is pointing!

And no, we haven't bombed France yet, but the Muslims will get them soon, since they don't allow the head scarves in schools anymore.

KlutzDio I Wrote:No wonder why other nations love us.

I really don't give a rat's ****** that other nations hate us. IMO, next time they need us and their populations are being slaughtered, I say......."F" 'Em.

GrayBeard Wrote:And no, we haven't bombed France yet, but the Muslims will get them soon, since they don't allow the head scarves in schools anymore.

You're right about that. ...and when France finds out that Syria was helping France's internal terrorists and decides to retaliate, we should do everything in our power to block their efforts. Yep, I'm ALL for "You screw me, I'll screw you". ....and I don't give a damn what any liberal says about it.

RebelKev Wrote:

KlutzDio I Wrote:No wonder why other nations love us.

I really don't give a rat's ****** that other nations hate us. IMO, next time they need us and their populations are being slaughtered, I say......."F" 'Em.

do you understand the economic ramifications that could have?

Kev, I believe people like you are in the majority in this country. I think most Americans would agree wholeheartedly with your comments about those pesky foreigners. Since majority rules, then I say we should go out and take over every other nation! Then we could have their resources without the half-hearted justifications to others for taking it. We could begin a system of genocide and exact this policy upon the world. Kill everyone who is not American and then the USA would not have any problems!

Well, since we are so prideful as a people, we'd have to keep some folks around to farm for us. Most Americans consider that kind of work "beneath" them. And this includes factory livestock farming and in that area we have a head-start. We already employ a bunch of Mexican dregs of society in killing-rooms, so fat Americans can enjoy filet mignon for supper.
We'd also have to keep a labor force alive to make silly crap for our consumerist economy, you know, like bumper stickers that say 'aint skeered.' Certainly we wouldn't want any blood on our hands, so we'd contract out guard duty for all these slaves to other "undesireables" [meaning anyone who made the wrong choice of which country to be born into].

Yeah man, the more I read your rhetoric, the more I agree with you! Let's just kill em all because all these pesky foreigners are nothing but a thorn in our side! Without them, we can run roughshod over the world!

I mean, really, how dare these people question the mighty and perfect United States government?

flyingswoosh Wrote:

RebelKev Wrote:

KlutzDio I Wrote:No wonder why other nations love us.

I really don't give a rat's ****** that other nations hate us. IMO, next time they need us and their populations are being slaughtered, I say......."F" 'Em.

do you understand the economic ramifications that could have?

We could cut off ties with everyone in the world and we would still not be any worse off. There would be growing pains but we have enough resources without trade to sustain this country. Sure, prices would go up and the supply and demand factors would come into play. We would eventually level off.

And you deride my conspiracy theory posts as "Twilight Zone". . .geez, Kev. I can sense, by your inappropriate language *tsk tsk* that you are awfully impassioned about this issue. But behind the angry white guy facade, I know there beats the heart of one true humanitarian who is liberal on social issues. . .not xenophobic, isolationistic (see also: Crusade for Freedom) or irrational.

I say we move to make Dumbya our emperor! Who's with me?

As a libertarian, I am socially liberal on most things. What this has to do with a bunch of beaners chanting "Osama, Osama" at a soccer game THEY WON, is beyond me.


BTW, the LP usually does support isolationism as far as government is concerned, as they believe the government should be limited. With that said, I don't want to spend one tax dollar helping out a bunch of ungrateful idiots like these.

RebelKev Wrote:BTW, the LP usually does support isolationism as far as government is concerned, as they believe the government should be limited. With that said, I don't want to spend one tax dollar helping out a bunch of ungrateful idiots like these.

actually we believe in staying out of foreign affairs to a large degree, but all the way. Second, if the LP was in power you wouldn't be paying income taxes.

flyingswoosh Wrote:actually we believe in staying out of foreign affairs to a large degree, but all the way. Second, if the LP was in power you wouldn't be paying income taxes.

Errrr....I have been involved with <a href='http://www.fairtax.org' target='_blank'>http://www.fairtax.org</a> for a few years now. I know.

RebelKev Wrote:BTW, the LP usually does support isolationism as far as government is concerned, as they believe the government should be limited. With that said, I don't want to spend one tax dollar helping out a bunch of ungrateful idiots like these.

But you have continually posted responses on this site supporting the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq, designed solely (if you believe the Prez's rhetoric, like you obviously do) to "help" them. Yeah, that's American policy for you--we bomb them in order to help them.

More inconsistent statements from the Kev-meister!

Which is it, Kev? You don't want to spend one dollar to help them, but you favor the Prez's $300 billion pricetag on war in Iraq? You probably also support all that dough we give to the Saudi ruling princes and Israel too!

All this from one who is college educated? What was your major, forestry?

But, in this latest post (quoted above), I do agree with you to an extent. Seriously, I don't think we should spend American taxpayer dollars on unnecessary wars, or to prop up evil regimes in Saudia Arabia and Israel!

KD, I feel both wars contributed to the safety of this country. Case closed.

RebelKev Wrote:

flyingswoosh Wrote:actually we believe in staying out of foreign affairs to a large degree, but all the way.&nbsp; Second, if the LP was in power you wouldn't be paying income taxes.

Errrr....I have been involved with <a href='http://www.fairtax.org' target='_blank'>http://www.fairtax.org</a> for a few years now. I know.

simply put, they're excise taxes, which is exactly what i agree with.

flyingswoosh Wrote:simply put, they're excise taxes, which is exactly what i agree with.

I have for a few years.

Kev, you say the wars are for the safety of our country and I disagree.

How can nations such as Afghanistan and Iraq, two puny little nations, one with little or not armed services, the other with a depleted and inefficient armed service (under the watchful eye of the allies, Britain and the USA) possibly threaten the safety of the mighty USA--the biggest, baddest and most fearsome military in the world?
Don't answer "terrorism" because those folks came from Saudi Arabia, for the most part.

You've got to be kidding me!

Afghanistan and Iraq were under the watchful eye of who?

Must I remind you of 9/11 and where the terrorists trained at? Yes, you bet your ****** that terrorism-supporting countries pose a threat. THAT should be obvious to you. You're being obtuse as hell, I just don't know why.