Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
A new question
Author Message
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #1
 
I found this letter on the NEA website

Quote:Home Schooling
I was pleased to see such a strong statement on home schooling (NEA 1998-99 Resolutions, September).

In Montana, home schoolers are not required to have even minimum qualifications, and students are not held to any standards. In fact, home schoolers here face no state requirements of any kind, except to notify the county superintendent of their intention to "teach" children at home.

Our state legislature doesn't have the courage to stand up to those in the religious right who resist controls of any kind.

Ron Osborn
Hamilton, Montana

Now I'm confused. I thought the, " those in the religious right" were the ones who tended to insist on controls of all kinds. You know, "No abortion," "No homosexual marriage," "No drinking/drugs".

Plus, I thought those on the left were supposed to be "Pro-choice."

Question- If this guy can't keep these things straight, do you really want "educators" like this teaching your kids?
04-22-2004 12:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


GrayBeard Offline
Whiny Troll
*

Posts: 33,012
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 880
I Root For: My Kids & ECU
Location: 523 Miles From ECU

Crappies
Post: #2
 
DrTorch Wrote:I found this letter on the NEA website

Quote:Home Schooling
I was pleased to see such a strong statement on home schooling (NEA 1998-99 Resolutions, September).

In Montana, home schoolers are not required to have even minimum qualifications, and students are not held to any standards. In fact, home schoolers here face no state requirements of any kind, except to notify the county superintendent of their intention to "teach" children at home.

Our state legislature doesn't have the courage to stand up to those in the religious right who resist controls of any kind.

Ron Osborn
Hamilton, Montana

Now I'm confused. I thought the, " those in the religious right" were the ones who tended to insist on controls of all kinds. You know, "No abortion," "No homosexual marriage," "No drinking/drugs".

Plus, I thought those on the left were supposed to be "Pro-choice."

Question- If this guy can't keep these things straight, do you really want "educators" like this teaching your kids?
It's just another union that see's money slipping away. It's not about the choice or anything like that...It's not about the wellfare of the children...It's not about the education of the children...It's about the Benjamins!
04-22-2004 12:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rickheel Offline
The Old Bastard
*

Posts: 8,468
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Heels
Location:

Donators
Post: #3
 
April 7, 2004

Phila. Middle School Teachers
Fail ‘Highly Qualified’ Tests

By Bess Keller

Half the Philadelphia middle school teachers who took tests to meet the federal "highly qualified" standard fell short.

The good news, district leaders say, is that the school system is ready to help them. Already in the works are plans for "academies" to beef up middle school teachers’ knowledge of their subjects and a contract with a test-preparation company to coach teachers for the tests.

Results on Pennsylvania’s tests, which are the same as those that some states now require new teachers to pass, varied significantly by subject. But in every subject, as well as the overall passing rate, teachers in the rest of the state markedly outpaced those in its biggest district, according to figures from the state education department.


Math Anxiety
Math teachers are in the most trouble. In Philadelphia, almost two out of three flunked, while in the rest of the state, just over one out of four failed. The failure rate for Philadelphia middle school teachers was 53 percent in science, 40 percent in English, and 32 percent in social studies. In the rest of the state, the failure rates in those subjects were around 20 percent.

Philadelphia has been the only district to ask the state education department for the numbers so far. The department will not provide any more breakdowns unless districts ask for them, said Brian Christopher, a spokesman.

About half of Philadelphia’s 1,346 7th and 8th grade teachers in the four subjects took the tests last September and November. Almost 3,000 of their peers elsewhere in Pennsylvania also took the exams then. Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, they have until the 2005-06 school year to pass them as a demonstration of subject-matter mastery.

"You have a group of folks who have certification who we are going to try to actively engage and support," said Joseph Jacovino, the Philadelphia district’s chief accountability officer. "Along with 500 other districts in the commonwealth, we have to devise a means of helping our teachers become highly qualified."

Responding to the 2002 federal law, Pennsylvania has specified that a teacher in a grade higher than 6th needs a college major or equivalent coursework in the subject taught or a passing grade on a test of that subject. States can also give veteran teachers an alternate to a major or a test, but Pennsylvania has not done so yet.


Free Courses
The problem of underqualified middle school teachers affects districts statewide because Pennsylvania, like many other states, has in the past allowed teachers with general elementary certification to teach 7th and 8th grades. But by 2006 such certification will not equal "highly qualified" status in those grades.

Philadelphia’s problem could be compounded by teachers’ relatively broad contractual rights.

If veteran 7th and 8th grade teachers with elementary certification do not pass the tests, they could decide to use their seniority rights to claim elementary school jobs, where they would be deemed "highly qualified." Those veteran middle school teachers in turn would bump the elementary teachers up to the middle schools. The vast majority of those teachers would be in violation of federal law because they also are not qualified in individual subjects.

Already the middle grades are the most difficult to staff in the 200,000-student district. The result could be much more teacher turnover without increases in qualified teachers.

"We have a shortage now, and now we’re making it tougher," said Joseph B. Ritvalsky, the principal of Pierce Middle School in Philadelphia. "The better-quality people are going to maneuver to the better assignments," he added.

Mr. Ritvalsky said some senior teachers in his school have not taken the tests, figuring they could always shift to a job in an elementary school.

He said he was not concerned that any of his teachers lack the necessary subject-matter expertise, "but I know the problem exists in other schools."

To test the teachers, the state is using the middle-grades Praxis II subject tests from the Educational Testing Service. They are roughly on the level of advanced high school work.

Mark Teoh, a research associate with the Philadelphia Education Fund who took the math test, got a perfect score, but he called the exam "challenging" for someone who doesn’t have time to bone up on content and test-taking skills.

District officials say they are beginning to help middle school teachers do just that, starting broadly with efforts to raise student achievement in the middle grades and training in the district’s new standardized curriculum. Those initiatives have support from GlaxoSmithKline, a drug company. The school system has also won a $500,000 grant from the Wachovia Corp., a financial-services company, to underwrite specially designed courses in content for 7th and 8th grade teachers at local universities.

In addition, the Princeton Review, a New York City-based test-preparation company, is about to be hired by the district to give 12-hour courses tailored to the Praxis II. Both the college and test-prep courses will be free to teachers, and the district will also reimburse the $80 cost of any test for teachers who pass.
04-22-2004 01:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #4
 
I'm one commie pinko, scum sucking librul who favors home schooling!!

Public schools have become nothing more than breeding grounds for baseball players (and other athletes), and those who can't play are mere prisoners of age. Once they turn 18 they turn these unskilled loose to suck up crack smoke while living in HUD apartments, continually spitting out kids faster than Dubya can invade nations!

I will likely never have children, but should it happen, i.e. marry someone with a kid or fail to use a jimmyhat, I'd home school my kids. I would never consider sending a child into a prison-like environment to get a substandard education.

Above all, by the time my imaginary kid is 18, I'd like to know they have the ability to reason correctly.
04-22-2004 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
joebordenrebel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,968
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #5
 
I thought you were sending your kids to St. Andrew's, D. What happened to that plan?

Well, besides the outrageous tuition, I mean.

Quote:Now I'm confused. I thought the, " those in the religious right" were the ones who tended to insist on controls of all kinds. You know, "No abortion," "No homosexual marriage," "No drinking/drugs".

Plus, I thought those on the left were supposed to be "Pro-choice."

Question- If this guy can't keep these things straight, do you really want "educators" like this teaching your kids?


I thought, when mentioning the stereotypes of the Right-wingers, that y'all want to prohibit "freedom" (even though you run around talking about it all the time). Freedom to have a child or not. Freedom to kiss boys and/or girls. Freedom to drink with boy and girl kids, much less freedom to share intraveneous needles when at all possible. Freedom to be a prudish, stuck up puss-pot morality hall-monitor.

I thought y'all were pro-life? No drinking, cussing, gay sex or taking illegal drugs doesn't sound like much of a life to me!
04-22-2004 05:50 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.