techfan4
Unregistered
|
I agree
UNC will at least be 6th...
No less
|
|
09-02-2002 07:30 PM |
|
nate jonesacc
Unregistered
|
FWIW, Duke had the exact same rain and 0 turnovers. UNC had 9.
|
|
09-02-2002 07:43 PM |
|
JD Heel
Unregistered
|
I'm not saying that rain means that everyone is going to be equally sloppy. If we have the same rain a week from now, chances are that Darian Durant may have no turnovers. But, on this freak Saturday, he was dropping the ball (many times on a shotgun snap) left and right.
I'm not blaming our loss on the rain. What I wil contend is that it gives an underdog a better chance of winning (as you saw in the UNC and dook games) and can cause for some sloppy play. It can also mean that someone having a terrible game can play even worse because of it.
-JD
<small>[ September 02, 2002, 08:50 PM: Message edited by: JD Heel ]</small>
|
|
09-02-2002 07:49 PM |
|
techfan4
Unregistered
|
the difference: UNC played sloppy and still hung with a better team than ECU or Duke...Duke didnt play sloppy and almost lost to ECU.
UNC will KILL duke(as will all other ACC teams)...be ready for it
|
|
09-02-2002 08:06 PM |
|
nate jonesacc
Unregistered
|
Um, I'm sorry Techfan, but UNC will not kill Duke. It will be close, very close.
And IMO Miami of Ohio = ECU.
|
|
09-02-2002 09:23 PM |
|
ClemTiger
Unregistered
|
1 FSU
2 Clemson
3 GT
4 NCState
5 UVA
6 UNC
7 Maryland
8 Wake
9 Duke
|
|
09-02-2002 11:05 PM |
|
JD Heel
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by nate jonesacc:
Um, I'm sorry Techfan, but UNC will not kill Duke. It will be close, very close.
And IMO Miami of Ohio = ECU.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm not throwing this out there to say that we will kill dook, because I think that ANY game has the potential to be a close game -- or an upset, even:
But, I think it was 1999 that we were 3-8 -- and still beat dook 38-0 or something like that. When dook is involved, a blowout is always possible....
Oh -- Miami is definitely better than ECU. They are better than they were last year, just as ECU is worse than they were last year.
-JD
|
|
09-03-2002 12:22 AM |
|
Doc NoleCat
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by Doc NoleCat:
But to lose by 3+ scores, AND get shut out, in your HOME FIELD -- even if it IS the Irish -- No repeat for the Terps!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damascus Terp replied:
what game where you watching??? Unless I missed something and they moved Giants Stadium to college park.....
Bad phrasing on my part, DT. I should've written "...as the HOME TEAM...." which, on the socreboard, you were.
Doesn't change anything else, though. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="frown.gif" />
|
|
09-04-2002 10:29 PM |
|
techfan4
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Doc NoleCat:
Originally posted by Doc NoleCat:
But to lose by 3+ scores, AND get shut out, in your HOME FIELD -- even if it IS the Irish -- No repeat for the Terps!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damascus Terp replied:
what game where you watching??? Unless I missed something and they moved Giants Stadium to college park.....
Bad phrasing on my part, DT. I should've written "...as the HOME TEAM...." which, on the socreboard, you were.
Doesn't change anything else, though. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="frown.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You didnt put "as the HOME TEAM" you put "your HOME FIELD"
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
sorry...had to put that <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />
|
|
09-05-2002 03:04 PM |
|
Doc NoleCat
Unregistered
|
Yes, TechFan, I admitted my mistake. Still doesn't change my predictions.
|
|
09-05-2002 05:29 PM |
|