Computer Loses 4,500 Votes in N.C.

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. - More than 4,500 votes have been lost in one North Carolina county because officials believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. Scattered other problems may change results in races around the state.

Local officials said UniLect Corp., the maker of the county's electronic voting system, told them that each storage unit could handle 10,500 votes, but the limit was actually 3,005 votes.


Expecting the greater capacity, the county used only one unit during the early voting period. "If we had known, we would have had the units to handle the votes," said Sue Verdon, secretary of the county election board.


Officials said 3,005 early votes were stored, but 4,530 were lost.


Jack Gerbel, president and owner of Dublin, Calif.-based UniLect, said Thursday that the county's elections board was given incorrect information. There is no way to retrieve the missing data, he said.


"That is the situation and it's definitely terrible," he said.


In a letter to county officials, he blamed the mistake on confusion over which model of the voting machines was in use in Carteret County. But he also noted that the machines flash a warning message when there is no more room for storing ballots.


"Evidently, this message was either ignored or overlooked," he wrote.


County election officials were meeting with State Board of Elections Executive Director Gary Bartlett on Thursday and did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.


The loss of the votes didn't appear to change the outcome of county races, but that wasn't the issue for Alecia Williams, who voted on one of the final days of the early voting period.


"The point is not whether the votes would have changed things, it's that they didn't get counted at all," Williams said.


Two statewide races remained undecided Thursday, for superintendent of public instruction, where the two candidates are about 6,700 votes apart, and agriculture commissioner, where they are only hundreds of votes apart.


How those two races might be affected by problems in individual counties was uncertain. The state still must tally more than 73,000 provisional ballots, plus those from four counties that have not yet submitted their provisionals, said Johnnie McLean, deputy director of the state elections board.


Nationwide, only scattered problems were reported in electronic voting, though roughly 40 million people cast digital ballots, voting equipment company executives had said.

If it was paper ballot, we still wouldn't know.

Paper ballots showing how you voted are a *horrible* idea, Mako. Being from WV, I'm sure you can figure out why. You're friendly neighborhood union rep demanding to see how you voted to keep your job; or to be fair and balanced; your evil capitalist boss offering a bonus to everyone who (verifiably) supports his evil capitalist candidate...

I think it could be anonymous. You have your "ATM" reciept. If people think their were shenanigans have them print out the reciepts and their votes. You could see if your vote was switched without anyone knowing your ballot #. Something like how grades were shown in college. I could see a problem of somebody adding votes from people who didn't show up though.