Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Offenses should shine in Tangerine
Author Message
techfan4
Unregistered

 
Post: #1
 
<a href='http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2002/1222/1481210.html' target='_blank'>http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2002/1222/1481210.html</a>

The Mazda Tangerine Bowl figures to be an exciting, fast-paced contest that keeps the scoreboard operator extremely busy. Both teams have the offensive arsenals to light it up, but their defensive units weren't able to demonstrate the consistency necessary to stop opponents in their tracks.

Texas Tech began the season way back on Aug. 24, falling to Ohio State in Columbus 45-21 in a game that saw things begin to unravel for the Red Raiders just before halftime. The rest of the season, coach Mike Leach's squad posted some statement-type victories but lacked consistency in the highly competitive Big 12.

The Red Raiders lost a tough overtime thriller 51-48 to a quality N.C. State squad on Sept. 21, then two weeks later pulled out a 48-47 come-from-behind overtime victory against Texas A&M.

Despite road losses to Iowa State and Colorado, the Red Raiders appeared to be finishing on quite a roll, winning in Lubbock against both Oklahoma State (49-24) and Texas (42-38).

But they caught Oklahoma at the wrong time, concluding the regular season with a 60-15 loss. Oklahoma's defense had struggled mightily in a loss to Texas A&M a few weeks before and was supremely motivated to re-establish its superiority against a high-profile quarterback like Texas Tech's Kliff Kingsbury.

Clemson's season began Aug. 31 at Georgia. In what turned out to be quite a game, the Tigers fell 31-28. I was there along with the entire College GameDay on ESPN Radio crew, and all of us came away with a sense that Clemson was poised to put together a good season.

This appeared to be the case early, as the Tigers rebounded from the Georgia loss to win three straight. But they hit a major bump in the road around midseason, losing three of four games and falling to .500. At the crossroads, coach Tommy Bowden's squad managed to go 3-1 down the stretch, keyed by the emergence of redshirt freshman QB Charlie Whitehurst. The 6-3, 209-pounder proved to be a good decision-maker, tossing only two interceptions and completing 62 percent of his aerials.

The matchup to watch in this bowl game is the battle between Red Raider cornerbacks Joselio Hanson (5-9, 170 pounds) and Ricky Sailor (5-10, 195) against the taller Clemson wideouts: 6-4 sophomore Derrick Hamilton, 6-5 junior Kevin Youngblood, 6-4 senior J.J. McKelvey, 6-1 senior Jackie Robinson and 5-11 sophomore Airese Curry.

When Texas Tech has the ball, all eyes will be on senior QB Kingsbury. The 6-3
12-23-2002 04:06 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Laettners Legacy Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,863
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 23
I Root For: Duke Blue Devil
Location:
Post: #2
 
come on Tigers- win this one for the ACC!
12-23-2002 05:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.