Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ACC Regular Season Champs
Author Message
Coach Doh
Unregistered

 
Post: #1
 
Not trying to take anything away from Wake Forest, but the TV announcers keep referring to an "ACC Regular Season Champion"
I may have missed it but I was under the impression that the ACC does NOT officially recognize a regular season champion. The champion of the ACC is the team that wins the ACC Tournament and the team that wins the most regular season games is only recognized as the #1 seed in the tourney. Is this correct?

doh 03-confused
03-02-2003 08:50 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


JoltinJacket
Unregistered

 
Post: #2
 
Nope, they do recognize the ACC reg. season champs. The team gets a banner and championship rings...the same as the tourney champs.
03-06-2003 04:24 PM
Quote this message in a reply
metro6775 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 207
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #3
 
So if you win both you get two rings?
03-06-2003 05:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JoltinJacket
Unregistered

 
Post: #4
 
metro6775 Wrote:So if you win both you get two rings?
I think you do, but I could be wrong...
03-06-2003 05:38 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Coach Doh
Unregistered

 
Post: #5
 
If there's a tie and the #1 seed in the tourney is decided by a flip of a coin then both of the teams(#1 seed and #2 seed) are still regular season co-champs and awarded banners and rings?

Things sure have changed a lot since when only the winner of the ACC tourney was eligible to go to the NCAA's.

doh
03-06-2003 06:07 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #6
 
I was under the impression that the ACC office recognizes the ACC tourney champs as the ACC champs. I don't know if that's correct or not.
03-06-2003 06:16 PM
Quote this message in a reply
JoltinJacket
Unregistered

 
Post: #7
 
nate jonesacc Wrote:I was under the impression that the ACC office recognizes the ACC tourney champs as the ACC champs. I don't know if that's correct or not.
Could be. Maybe it's only the schools that recognize it. I'm just going on Tech, because we have a banner for being the outright champs in 1996 (see ring below). I don't think we have a banner for being the 1985 co-champs though.

[Image: 1997%20-%20Basketball%20Media%20Guide.jpg]



<!--EDIT|JoltinJacket|Mar 6 2003, 07:16 PM-->
03-06-2003 07:09 PM
Quote this message in a reply
JD Heel
Unregistered

 
Post: #8
 
I've always been under the same impression as Nate. UNC hangs a banner for both -- but then again, we were actually usually winning one or the other back in the day. 03-wink

-JD
03-06-2003 08:01 PM
Quote this message in a reply
SSJT Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 922
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #9
 
it doesnt matter who gets credit, the acc regular season champ deserves more respect then the tournament champ
03-06-2003 08:06 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #10
 
SSJT Wrote:it doesnt matter who gets credit, the acc regular season champ deserves more respect then the tournament champ
Bull... the ACC tourney measures how well a team can do under pressure and how well it can resist a fluke. The ACC regular season is just playing for seeding in the ACC tourney.
03-06-2003 08:34 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Jenibu
Unregistered

 
Post: #11
 
Notice the following pattern:

Those in support of the Tourney- Duke fans + JD

Those who recognize/respect the Regular Season Champs- other fans

hmm... :eek: 03-razz

BTW, I do think the ACC office recognizes the tourney champs as the ACC Champs, and the individual schools hang banners to honor their regular season championships. However, saying that the regular season is just for seeding and doesn't deserve as much respect as winning the tourney is bull.
03-06-2003 09:39 PM
Quote this message in a reply
nate jonesacc
Unregistered

 
Post: #12
 
Jenibu Wrote:Notice the following pattern:

Those in support of the Tourney- Duke fans + JD

Those who recognize/respect the Regular Season Champs- other fans

hmm... :eek: 03-razz

BTW, I do think the ACC office recognizes the tourney champs as the ACC Champs, and the individual schools hang banners to honor their regular season championships. However, saying that the regular season is just for seeding and doesn't deserve as much respect as winning the tourney is bull.
It's just cause Gary has never won an ACC tourney, and Maryland has only won a few as a school.

The Regular Season ACC is worth respect, no doubt, but not nearly as much as the ACC tourney.

And Duke currently holds the record for most ACC regular season titles in a row, so this is an objective opinion.
03-06-2003 10:06 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Lucy
Unregistered

 
Post: #13
 
nate jonesacc Wrote:
Jenibu Wrote:Notice the following pattern:

Those in support of the Tourney- Duke fans + JD

Those who recognize/respect the Regular Season Champs- other fans

hmm... :eek: 03-razz

BTW, I do think the ACC office recognizes the tourney champs as the ACC Champs, and the individual schools hang banners to honor their regular season championships. However, saying that the regular season is just for seeding and doesn't deserve as much respect as winning the tourney is bull.
It's just cause Gary has never won an ACC tourney, and Maryland has only won a few as a school.

The Regular Season ACC is worth respect, no doubt, but not nearly as much as the ACC tourney.

And Duke currently holds the record for most ACC regular season titles in a row, so this is an objective opinion.
It is true. The official conference champion is the winner of the ACC tournament. The "regular season champ" moniker is something touted by individual schools as a tool to use to distinguish themselves amongst each other in conference competition & competition for recruits. It's more of a "feel-good" thing, despite the harping by the media over the fact that "Wake hasn't won a regular season title outright since 1962"...

I've enjoyed my team being #1 in conference competition since the halfway point, but I realize that getting that #1 seed for the tourney is the goal, because the road to a conference championship is a little bit easier for a 1 seed than a 2 seed.



<!--EDIT|Lucy|Mar 7 2003, 10:28 AM-->
03-07-2003 08:12 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Coach Doh
Unregistered

 
Post: #14
 
Lucy Wrote:
nate jonesacc Wrote:
Jenibu Wrote:Notice the following pattern:

Those in support of the Tourney- Duke fans + JD

Those who recognize/respect the Regular Season Champs- other fans

hmm... :eek: 03-razz

BTW, I do think the ACC office recognizes the tourney champs as the ACC Champs, and the individual schools hang banners to honor their regular season championships. However, saying that the regular season is just for seeding and doesn't deserve as much respect as winning the tourney is bull.
It's just cause Gary has never won an ACC tourney, and Maryland has only won a few as a school.

The Regular Season ACC is worth respect, no doubt, but not nearly as much as the ACC tourney.

And Duke currently holds the record for most ACC regular season titles in a row, so this is an objective opinion.
It is true. The official conference champion is the winner of the ACC tournament. The "regular season champ" moniker is something touted by individual schools as a tool to use to distinguish themselves amongst each other in conference competition & competition for recruits. It's more of a "feel-good" thing, despite the harping by the media over the fact that "Wake hasn't won a regular season title outright since 1962"...

I've enjoyed my team being #1 in conference competition since the halfway point, but I realize that getting that #1 seed for the tourney is the goal, because the road to a competition is a little bit easier for a 1 seed than a 2 seed.
Thank-you Lucy!

04-bow

I guess we also have to realize that it's still a fact that whoever wins the ACC tournament is guaranteed a berth in the NCAA tourney while the winner of the regular season is not guaranteed a slot in the NCAA tournament.

doh



<!--EDIT|Coach Doh|Mar 7 2003, 01:39 PM-->
03-07-2003 08:32 AM
Quote this message in a reply
JD Heel
Unregistered

 
Post: #15
 
We all know that the winner of the regular season "championship" is always going to be guaranteed a slot in the tourney. It's just a guaranteed at-large berth instead of an automatic bid.

-JD
03-07-2003 10:40 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Jenibu
Unregistered

 
Post: #16
 
JD Heel Wrote:We all know that the winner of the regular season "championship" is always going to be guaranteed a slot in the tourney. It's just a guaranteed at-large berth instead of an automatic bid.

-JD
Exactly.

Now, to avoid making a one-worded post...

Winning the ACC Regular Season "Championship" displays consistancy and the ability to win night in and night out, on the road and at home. Winning the ACC tourney displays the ability to get hot and stay hot over a 3 day (sometimes 4) period and, as Nate said, play well in pressure situations. Both are deserving of respect, but IMO, the regular season championship deserves more respect because winning it proves that you have played well for over two months. I mean, who do you think deserves more respect? A team that goes undeafeated in league play but loses in the tourney or a losing conference team that gets hot and wins the tourney? Sure, the losing team displayed an obvious TREMENDOUS performance to beat the odds, but should theirs ultimately be dubbed better than the (previously) undefeated team?

Now, when you win five in a row like Duke, that does deserve a great amount of respect (unfortunately 03-razz ).
03-08-2003 12:17 AM
Quote this message in a reply
JoltinJacket
Unregistered

 
Post: #17
 
Jenibu Wrote:IMO, the regular season championship deserves more respect because winning it proves that you have played well for over two months.

Same way I feel. A good example is what happened in 1997. NC State finished 8th in the regular season. They beat Tech in the play-in game, then beat top seeded Duke and Maryland before falling just short against Carolina in the championship game. I have respect for that run they had, but that was a whole lot more of a fluke than Duke winning the regular season "championship" that year.
03-08-2003 12:47 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Coach Doh
Unregistered

 
Post: #18
 
Without the ACC Tournament there could be the possibility of multiple teams in first place when the regular season is over. The ACC tournament gives us a clear cut ACC Champion to represent the conference. Without the ACC tournament there would be some goofy-assed set of rules that would determine the champ in case of a tie made up by the same people that gave us the alternating possession on a held ball rule.

I agree the regular season champ is noteworthy and being the regular season champ should be a lock for an NCAA bid. But the ACC tourney also gives a team who gets hot at the end of the season and may have had a rough beginning a chance to win a slot in the big dance.

doh
03-08-2003 08:29 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Coach Doh
Unregistered

 
Post: #19
 
Congratulations to the Wake Forest Demon Deacons, the ACC regualr season champs. You've been a class act all the way!

doh
03-08-2003 05:11 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.