Quote:I think there are legit questions as to where the money is going.
Agreed, but the answers aren't black and white.
Quote:Why does it cost the MAC so much to be on TV, when others are getting paid to be on TV?
I don't know that non-BCS conferences are getting paid. Seems I've read that Conference USA's television money is all basketball-related.
Quote:(And MU at VaTech cost the MAC??? It was highly rated to boot???)
It was at Virginia Tech, thus, I don't believe the MAC owned rights to the game. This game was probably not aired as part of the MAC-ESPN contract, thus it came as no cost to the MAC. (Virginia Tech and/or the Big East, on the other hand, were probably paid handsomely).
The two contract games would have been Miami-Marshall and Ball State-Marshall.
Quote:And why is that contract so ****** that the MAC can't even get its best games on? Sure ratings will be down...if you show a boring game.
It's life. It's reality.
Quote:Why wasn't BG/ut be on local TV? (Are the rights to broadcasts sold, even if ESPN doesn't air the games?)
Parts of this are speculative, but this is the way I believe itworked:
It wasn't on local television because Toledo didn't want it on. They wanted a strong crowd and feared it would not be strong if the game had been on television.
Once ESPN passed on a national broadcast, the league could have tried to get it on television in agreement with Fox Sports Detroit/Ohio/Midwest/Pittsburgh etc. I don't know if this was pursued.
Failing that (or maybe in addition to that, depend on the contracts previously drawn up by the lawyers), Toledo could have "shopped" the game to a local television station. Maybe ESPN+ could have done production. Maybe the local station would have done it.
In any case, Toledo didn't want to do that. And, once ESPN, and Fox Sports/the MAC passed, the rights belonged to Toledo and Toledo alone -- unless the rules of the MAC allow visiting schools in conference games to shop television in addition to home schools. I have no idea if they do or not.
Even if Bowling Green had a right to shop the game to television, considering how pathetic our electronic media situation is right now, I don't think Bowling Green was in a position to do so. The best we could have hoped for, I would guess, is a cablecast on certain Time Warner systems.
I invite others (particularly Marshall fans) to correct or clarify what I've written here about TV rights.