(01-16-2018 11:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-16-2018 11:47 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(01-16-2018 11:15 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-16-2018 10:01 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I'll call Manning a She when Science tells me that He is a She. Until then, that pooper pusher should be hung for his crimes.

Even for you, that post was an amazing combination of fail for such a short post.

I seriously doubt the term 'pooper pusher' would apply to Ms Manning.

But to your other allegation. It appears that science has spoken. And medical associations, representing 450,000 licensed medical professionals agrees with Chelsea Manning in her identification as female.

Now, there is another 'medical' group, which has about 450 members, not all of which are licensed medical doctors, that says otherwise.

450,000 to 450 agree with Ms Manning. Science is telling you that Chelsea Manning is a she. You just aren't listening.

And I thought you guys didn't defer to science anyway.

You just went full loon.

Ok...so you feel that being Trans is a 'mental illness', although the overwhelming majority of medical experts would disagree with you on that?

And then you feel that being 'mentally ill' under your definition should disqualify someone from running for office?

Is it your position that Transgender persons should be barred from running for office as a broad category?

Legitimate question.

Were on a thread about Chelsea Manning's candidacy for the US Senate. Is it your position that she should be barred from running for office because she is Transgender?

I'm going to keep asking.

I'll jump in again with, "run, forest run".....

we're begging for it.....or did that fly over again hurt more feewin's....

if you think we're going back off on spinster smack, you'd be wrong....