Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
College football doesn't fairly name a national champion
Author Message
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,227
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2440
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #45
RE: College football doesn't fairly name a national champion
(01-05-2018 11:35 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-05-2018 11:30 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(01-05-2018 10:44 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  
(01-05-2018 10:29 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(01-05-2018 09:48 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  Yes, there is. All conference champions get playoff spots like any real sport.

So if Ark-State wins its conference with a 7-5 record and makes the playoffs, while 12-1 Clemson doesn't win its conference so doesn't make the playoffs, that's "fair"?

In real sports you generally have division champions and a couple of wildcards. This is not unusual or "unfair".

What makes it seem "unfair" in college football is that the cartel structure has stunted any potential parity between conferences and widened the gap.

LSU, Bama, and the rest of the elites have extreme institutionalized recruiting advantages, one of which is the fact that they have playoff access and others do not.

How many wild cards? Not enough to cover the disparity. The NCAA hoops tourney works because there are enough "wild cards" to let all reasonably deserving non-champs in. Football can't do that so auto-bids for champs is a no-go.

Recruiting? LSU and Bama have massive recruiting advantages over Ark-State because they have built up huge fan bases over 120 years of playing football and thus have created an extremely attractive platform - in terms of home attendance, TV, and media attention - for players to play on.

And they maintain those advantages by having a cartel that freezes those advantages in place and limits others from following and acheving the same level of success.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Correct me if I'm wrong, but your idea of a "non-cartel" LSU or Alabama would be a system that allows Arkansas State to share in the brand value and wealth generated by LSU and Alabama (and others) over those years without having worked for it, including forcing them to play against you even if they don't want to.

Hint: That's not how LSU and Alabama built their programs. They didn't go to Notre Dame and Princeton in 1915 and say "hey you guys, you better schedule us and let us play against you for championships, or else you're running a cartel that is holding us down!".
01-05-2018 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: College football doesn't fairly name a national champion - quo vadis - 01-05-2018 11:44 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.