(10-07-2017 10:09 PM)badmoonrising13 Wrote:  Childers played much, much better than Santa today. Santa would have won today's game as well but he would not have played as well as Childers. You go with performance until the kid doesn't perform...

This is where your argument goes off track. I am not saying you are wrong with this comment, but this comment supports the very decision making issues you have so adamantly been critical of with Carey. Carey had an open competition in camp, and let the individual oerformance dictate who wins. Graham apparently won that battle. Graham goes down and Santa steps in and does everything that is asked of him (and more) with the exception of a horrible pass, on a potential game winning drive (on a questionable play call); against the best team the program has faced since OSU. Childers comes in and does a good, not great, job against a weak opponent. So you, like Carey, jump of the Santa bandwagon that you have been riding so hard until the last 2 minutes of SDSU.
Carey is making decisions on the data he has in front of him, that will give the team the best chance to win. He made a call today and the team won a game against an inferior opponent. So strap up the Childers saddle and ride that horse for as long as he will take you, until he screws up. Isn't it ironic that in the end you and Carey seem to be completely aligned?