(09-28-2017 09:02 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 08:55 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 08:50 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(09-28-2017 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-27-2017 05:14 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  The idea that the "Jones Act" is keeping supplies from PR is ludicrous, ridiculous, and a deflection from the point that there is debris in water impeding shipping, there is no power at the ports to power the cranes to unload supplies, and there is damaged infrastructure keeping supplies from being delivered.

Link?

You are are questioning if there is damage after a hurricane?

https://www.fema.gov/news-release/2017/0...astructure

No, I'm questioning whether there is still debris in the water preventing ships from making port in PR.

No, that wasn't all that you bolded.

And I didn't say "preventing," that's the word you inserted to try to help recover from your original question.

Sorry...you said it was ludicrous it was the Jones act "keeping supplies from PR" (your words) so I assumed you were then saying it was the debris in the water that was keeping the supplies from PR. Apologies.