(09-10-2017 11:27 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(09-10-2017 11:12 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-10-2017 11:09 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(09-10-2017 10:49 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Those are all top 6 AAC games versus bottom of other G5 conferences. You were favored in all games, and did the expected 6-0. The Tulsa @Toledo game should be a better gauge of power.

Air Force and maybe UNM or MARSHALL are the only other upper half G5 matchups.

We have lost two games against the g4 in over two years. There is a clear seperation.

Tulsa's defense is out of sync and looking bad right now. They're still going to win vs toledo. I was thinking 7-14 points. It'll be a shoot out and I am thinking tulsa wins by 4.

Forewarning: G4 fans are gonna come back at you quoting Bowl records...

Well, those games were played. And that stat discounts games against Army and BYU. So yea, it is misleading.

Anyway, it will be very interesting to see how things pan out this year. The AAC is a bit down, with all the new coaches. The MAC seems to be improved. The MW is about the same (Top Heavy).

Slowly coming back to reality I see fanhood, good for you keep working at it.

Can anyone off the top of their head tell me what the PAC's bowl record was two years ago? Big xii? Bowls are fun, but other than ny6 and playoffs no one pays attention to them. Players take them off, coaches leave. Regular season doesn't have any of that, its a flat equal best vs best on the field and in the booth.

Last I checked neither army or byu is in a conference and they for sure aren't in the G4.

I would like to take your assesment of teams and conferences seriously, but you picked fau to win vs Navy and that games outcome showed how biased your opinion is.

The MWC just lost its one shot at the ny6 bowl with boise going down. Even short games the AAC has the inside track now.