(07-15-2017 10:29 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(07-15-2017 09:50 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(07-15-2017 09:00 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 08:11 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(07-13-2017 08:09 PM)fanhood Wrote:  Agreed. No team in the MW would increase the AAC's TV contract value, and no team in the AAC would increase the value for the MW. We are all in the same G5 boat. I hope for the best for you.

Actually, Houston brings value. They are the only one.

Thanks but I have to kindly disagree

I must say majority AAC programs bring importance value something no G4 can come close to matching.

I'd use Rutgers for example... They rarely ever have constant productivity in their football basketball where it matters most and look what the B1G was able to produce in their overrated tv deal.

If value is defined by population, and therefore potential viewership numbers, then you are right. Nobody could argue with that fact.

But look at Nebraska going to the B1G. That expansion had nothing to do with population/viewership numbers, and everything to do with perceived value of the program.

Look at Big 12 expansion, or lack thereof, to show how none of the teams in the AAC, or MW for that matter, actually bring value. Again, same G5 boat.

LOL... This reply here ^^^ proves why Apple n Oranges shouldn't be in the same basket all at once but rather one be used for juice while the other for pie.

You can use any imaginable scenario you see fit but we can never confuse the AAC with any of said G4's.

Oh, and don't get me started with the dead walking conference, the big12-2

Fanhood gonna fanhood, i mean tv ratings dont matter and the mwc budgets are on par with the AAC, nothing to see here. .