(07-25-2017 12:08 PM)NoDak Wrote:  

(07-25-2017 12:07 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(07-25-2017 12:04 PM)NoDak Wrote:  

(07-25-2017 11:53 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  Izzo's tweet is quoting the MVFC commish as saying there is currently no 12th team they're looking at.

Divisions sound good in principle, but teams like MO St, UNI, and even W ILL, who've all been with the MVFC since Gateway days, will fight like h___ against being stuck in a divison with Dakotas ... simple as that.

W ILL might lose that argument on account of being in the Summit, but that still only gives five, and UNI and MO St won't lose that argument. Would really, really like to see E ILL come to the Summit and be put in that division, in that case.

Or, would take UNC in the Summit, but don't think that's in the cards. No moveup in the upper Midwest can afford MVFC football, either. And probably zero chance for Oral, Denver, Omaha, or Kansas City to (re)start football.

Viverito is quoted that "a twelve team league with two divisions is attractive to us", but denied any school is being looked at. Hardly a denial.

Murray St is in and RMU is in too when the Dakotas take their balls and start a Summit only fb league with the Montanas, Idaho and EWU.

So I see you have moved the goal posts again. Now it is a Summit FB only league with the 4 Big Sky schools.





Whose's AD's Basement were you in when you heard that?

Have said that for some time. You simply refuse to listen. The Montanas and Idaho will be singing that chorus soon enough because the Big Sky simply doesn't want to be competitive, but only be cheap like NAU.

Cheap? NAU funds football fully, has a new renovated dome. And is competitive year in and out.

You are a fool.