(07-17-2017 12:51 PM)SactoHornetAlum Wrote:  

(07-17-2017 11:42 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(07-16-2017 09:56 PM)NoDak Wrote:  

(07-16-2017 07:24 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(07-16-2017 06:39 PM)NoDak Wrote:  The idea has been simmering for generations of Montana and NoDak U presidents, but this board rejects it as ludicrous. When it happens, all the sudden they will think it a brilliant move.

The rest of the Big Sky, excepting Weber St, isn't academically or athletically worthy of the Montanas, Idaho, and EWU, and all their Presidents and fans know it.

1). No. Montana Presidents aren't and haven't pined for Dakotas

2). NAU is the athletic and academic equal or better of any public Slummitt or Big Sky school.

You are having conversations in your mind that don't exist. Must have frozen your brain up there

NAU should have pined for NMSU, and became permanent partners with them would have been a good strategic move. But instead NAU doesn't have any natural ally but SUU. GCU would be one, but NAU rejects them.

The Montanas know better than to look on NAU as a partner, but more as a leech.

Why would we pine for a school 8 hours away when there is one half of that? NMSU had/has no interest in FCS football.

Yes, NAU is such a leech - funds 25% more scholarships in all sports than the Montana schools, is actually good at other sports, continually finishes ahead of them (usually winning) the All-Sports Trophy, and has the only team National Championship in Big Sky history - and in one that 95% of DI schools compete in, not a niche sport like Hockey.

Plus more individual national championships than EWU, Montana and Montana State combined.


Yeah, leeches.



But go back to moving your goal posts, and your fantasies about when happened in your basement with non-existent people when you were a kid.

Obviously talking about a team Natty that isn't a FCS football Natty...?