Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Who replaces North Dakota in BIG SKY in 2019?
Author Message
SactoHornetAlum Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 119
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Sac State
Location:
Post: #168
RE: Who replaces North Dakota in BIG SKY in 2019?
(07-17-2017 11:42 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 09:56 PM)NoDak Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 07:24 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 06:39 PM)NoDak Wrote:  
(07-16-2017 01:09 PM)shizzle787 Wrote:  I don't have much of a dog in the fight, but I do believe that the Big Sky will stay with 11. As far as the whole Summit thing, I do think that we will see the Montanas and the Idahos in the Summit at some point while Fort Wayne and Western Illinois will leave for more travel-friendly pastures. Why would the Idahos and Montanas join the Summit? Brand. State flagships are almost always sexier than most other schools. No one is stopping the Montanas and Idahos from scheduling California, Arizona, or Texas schools in football or basketball during the non-conference portion of their schedules.

The idea has been simmering for generations of Montana and NoDak U presidents, but this board rejects it as ludicrous. When it happens, all the sudden they will think it a brilliant move.

The rest of the Big Sky, excepting Weber St, isn't academically or athletically worthy of the Montanas, Idaho, and EWU, and all their Presidents and fans know it.


1). No. Montana Presidents aren't and haven't pined for Dakotas

2). NAU is the athletic and academic equal or better of any public Slummitt or Big Sky school.

You are having conversations in your mind that don't exist. Must have frozen your brain up there

NAU should have pined for NMSU, and became permanent partners with them would have been a good strategic move. But instead NAU doesn't have any natural ally but SUU. GCU would be one, but NAU rejects them.

The Montanas know better than to look on NAU as a partner, but more as a leech.

Why would we pine for a school 8 hours away when there is one half of that? NMSU had/has no interest in FCS football.

Yes, NAU is such a leech - funds 25% more scholarships in all sports than the Montana schools, is actually good at other sports, continually finishes ahead of them (usually winning) the All-Sports Trophy, and has the only team National Championship in Big Sky history - and in one that 95% of DI schools compete in, not a niche sport like Hockey.

Plus more individual national championships than EWU, Montana and Montana State combined.


Yeah, leeches.



But go back to moving your goal posts, and your fantasies about when happened in your basement with non-existent people when you were a kid.

Obviously talking about a team Natty that isn't a FCS football Natty...?
07-17-2017 12:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Who replaces North Dakota in BIG SKY in 2019? - SactoHornetAlum - 07-17-2017 12:51 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.