(06-14-2017 07:59 PM)murrdcu Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 06:34 PM)JRsec Wrote:  ....."Do you think the SEC would offer both Oklahoma and Oklahoma State?" Paul replied, "Sure, Oklahoma State is a very competitive program in their own right." Caller's second question was, "Why don't we hear more about this?" Finebaum, "Because we are probably 4 or 5 years away from them being able to respond due to the GOR." Caller is Oklahoma interested? Finebaum, "I hear they are very interested."

Who knows but it occurred to me the hay may be in the barn on this pair. If so it could open up other product. It will be interesting to see where we go from here.

If OU and OSU are locked down, then the play has to be Texas. If OU with OSU pays its way then Texas and Tech probably do as well. If Texas still refuses, would KU and WVU cover spots 17 and 18?

If Texas was willing to move to the PAC with OU and OSU and initially A&M and later Tech then why shouldn't they be willing to move to the SEC with OU and OSU now? The question is will they insist upon Tech or will they be satisfied with A&M? If they are content with A&M then Kansas would do nicely. If not we make room for Tech. Who knows if we go beyond that?

Could we possibly see something like this:

Kansas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas Tech
Arkansas, Louisiana State, Ole Miss, Missouri, Texas A&M

Alabama, Auburn, Mississippi State, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, West Virginia