(06-11-2017 09:23 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(06-11-2017 05:32 AM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  

(06-10-2017 02:04 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  North Alabama have asked the SBC to join them back in like 2011 or 2012 year. For sure that we know that wanted FBS status.

North Alabama maybe Kennesaw State will make their way up there with them.
Jacksonville State
Stony Brook
Delaware would want FBS if James Madison goes.
Lamar
Sam Houston State
SFA
Eastern Kentucky
Northern Iowa
Missouri State will go to FBS since MVC is weak now.
Wichita State
Youngstown State
Illinois State
Indiana State

Now, if more see they moved up? Others might want to do the same.
Chattanooga, Towson, East Tennessee State, Villanova (just to stay with the P5 schools if there becomes a 1A and 1AA in basketball), Richmond, VCU could pull the trigger to add football and so forth.
There are schools not D1 yet that are aiming for FBS already.
Texas A&M-San Antonio
Texas A&M-Central Texas
Hawaii-West Oahu (could help Hawaii out in the future)?

With that said, G5 may have to go regional, and La Tech could be in a conference without La.-Monroe as well.
If MVFC could move up as a whole? They could be a semi-power conference along with AAC and MWC. Could take the best of the rest of C-USA, MAC and SBC with a couple of Powerful FCS schools to create a Semi-Power conference for 4. Then, reformed the G5 to include CAA, Big Sky, Southland and Southern.

you have become a parody of yourself which is pretty terrible

TAMU-SA and TAMU-Central Texas are not even full 4 year schools they are Jr and Sr only and they have enrollments of 4,564 and 2,466

here is the 190 page TAMU-SA master plan

http://www.tamusa.edu/uploadFile/folders...t_Plan.pdf

the word football is not mentioned 1 time in that plan and if you look at the images those are soccer fields not football fields

here is the TAMU Central Texas plan

https://www.tamuct.edu/files/docs/financeadmin/CDP.pdf

here is what it says

They propose a football stadium that, over time, might have a seating capacity of up to 15,000 persons. This would be at full build-out and would be constructed in increments appropriate to demand.

so you are trying to say that one university that does not mention the word football one time in their 190 page master plan and another university that mentions a football stajium that AT FULL BUILD OUT would seat 15,000 are aspiring to play D1-A football?

at this point I am surprised you left off UHCL, north Texas state dallas and UH-Victoria and UH Downtown (they could play in the Dynamo stajium like Texas Southern)

http://www.tamusa.edu/about/future-development.html

Look at the bottom drawing when they hit 25,000 students. There is a drawing plans for a football stadium.

On the Wiki page for Central Texas had the future football stadium plans for 30,000 seats. Why build that big of a stadium if you are planning to go to the top?

There are 7 D1-A schools in the Waco-San Antonio-Houston triangle, 3 are P5 and 3 struggle to fill their stadium; and about 10 more D1 schools in east Texas. Where do you propose support comes from for 2 new TAMU system schools that currently have no athletics? Hawai'i-West O'ahu is in the same position as the other two with no athletics and located 20 miles from Hawai'i-Manoa, who also has difficulties filling their stadium.