(03-20-2017 02:37 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 02:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 02:25 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 01:38 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 01:30 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  The same people that believe in an invisible man in the sky with no evidence are more than happy to require 100 years of evidence to believe anything that they don't want to believe.

Good job proving Rath's point in the other thread.

It's just interesting that in some cases you are willing to accept something with no evidence whatsoever, and in other cases, years of research, mounds of evidence and successful predictions are not enough.

Please show me the mounds of evidence and predictions on climate change that have been proven true.

Exhibit A. Did the poles melt yet?

Exhibit B. Did we have a barrage of Katrina Cat 5 hurricanes hitting our coast?


Some of you are hysterical. You'll deny the existence of God, even though if you were scientific you would know you couldnt do that, and despite the eons of prophecy which has come true.

Yet you will believe in climate change, a topic which is so flawed that they cant even get a major forecast or prediction anywhere in the ballpark.

Prophecy? What prophecy?

Sure, God could exist, along with Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Can't prove they don't exist either.

And thats the problem you have. I dont have to prove God exists, and I'm not going to force him on you. Whether or not you accept Him is up to you.

And likewise, you cant prove climate change, so stop trying to force that on me.

Last time I checked, God Almighty wasnt requiring us to wreck our economy and pick winners and losers for accepting him.