(03-12-2017 06:27 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-12-2017 04:30 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(03-12-2017 04:24 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-12-2017 04:02 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  link Bull?

Don't need a link. You've already posted that they were investigating the Democratic hack, the Russians, and any connections between this an the Trump campaign. You have a transcript of conversations between the Russian ambassador and Flynn, a private citizen, that apparently occurred while Fynn was at Trump Tower. Either you believe the wire tap story, or all the rest of this leakded "Russian investigation" stuff is false as well. Cant have it both ways.

And there is that as well Mach....

The biggest evidence is the dems are starting to walk back the Russian-Trump connection stuff. Why? Because after seeing the evidence files, there is no "there" there. Even worse, its obvious the Trump camp was being spied on and there really was never much evidence to support the spying. It was basically a "Trumped" up charge used as an excuse to electronically monitor the Trump camp. It could easily blow up into the biggest scandal since Watergate. I mean, this was a White House that investigated reporters, used the IRS to attack conservative non-profits, and confiscated phone the records of UPI. Its really not hard to believe they also listened in on Trump.

And wiretapped a dim Congressman IN his congressional office. A clear crossing of the separation of powers "line".

So, as it's applied in other threads, if zerO was clearly willing and emboldened to eavesdrop on a member(s) of his own party to try to thwart their legislative efforts, why would it surprise anyone if they thought it a good idea to wiretap a political foe?

Doesn't surprise me in the least.