(10-17-2016 09:04 PM)Frog in the Kitchen Sink Wrote:  

(10-17-2016 08:56 PM)Wolfman Wrote:  Conspiracy Theory:

I've said all along that Boren was laying the ground work to challenge the GoR. The B12 added a CCG but no network and no expansion. Boren is going to argue that the GoR is detrimental and should be voided.

Hard to make that argument listening to him tonight. Obviously politicians are duplicitous but I get the feeling any OU moves will be made by a successor.

Any real harm comes after the earliest damages attainable from exclusion that could have been avoided with expansion (assuming that is even a valid argument). That's...at least a year or two from now? So, 2017/18, 2018/19? At that point, when the end of the GoR is so in sight, why bother, or, what I've wondered since they signed this thing, why you wouldn't see conference-wide movement to dissolve the thing earlier anyway?