I'll say how I evaluate our frosh and transfers for a four year career:

1). For frosh, primarily at PG, SG, and SF (primary scoring positions):

< 2.5 ppg - possible D-I washout or not in the 8 or 9 man rotation. Look for a lot of them to transfer 'downward' within D-I or to D-II.
2.5 - 5 ppg - probably member of the 8 or 9 man rotation during much of his career.
5 - 10 ppg - probable starters for a few seaons, if not a starter now. Possible All-MAC (e.g., HM or say 3rd or 2nd team).
10+ - Four year starter, All-MAC (1st, 2nd or 3rd team material before career is over).

2). For PF I relax the standards some, and centers a bit more.

Based on this table, Bond has potential to make an all-MAC team (e.g., HM or higher). Toney is also a probable starter and could develop into an All-MAC HM type player. Both based on their respective FROSH seasons.

I could add Madray in that group based on his two years at Binghamton.

Right on cue. My 'rating table' fits WMU to a tee:

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketba...an-broncos

Matasovic and Harris are gone. Dieng looks like a long shot to finish his career to WMU.

Wilder and Lamont will do well. Wilder could star. Lamont will have to fight off Dugan to remain a starter, though. Lucky WMU. (can we trade a player to WMU for Lamont? Lol).