(10-16-2014 06:35 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-16-2014 06:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-16-2014 05:37 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-16-2014 05:22 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-16-2014 05:14 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  How does the existence of EV-D86 in Canada prove that I'm racist for adking if the influx of illegal immigrants in the US is related to the EV-D86 outbreak in the US?

it proves that there is pretty compelling evidence that D68 is not related to illegal immigration. so continuing to say it is so could be the result of people allowing their personal dislike for illegals in general to think slandering them is acceptable.

No, it just proves that EV-D68 is in Canada just as it is in the US, Asia, Europe, and many Central American countries.

Oh, and i have slandered no individual or group. Retract that statement immediately.

this particular outbreak is in the US & canada. it is not in asia europe or latin america yet.

not retracting it unless you state that there is no evidence linking this to illegal immigrants.

Wow. So you own the final verdict as to what was a right answer to your original question huh?

Mods, is john in compliance by claiming I've slandered illegal immigrants when I have made no slanderous statement? Is he in compliance by refusing to accept that i do not believe it is racist to ask the question that he posed in the OP?

John you keep changing the argument to fit you position. You should be willing to accept that not everybody shares you point of view and that by disagreeing with you, I am not slandering illegal immigrants. I am entitled to feel that asking the question is not racist. You are not entitled to claiming i have slandered an entire group of people by asking that question.

my final verdict is the truth. with all the information that we have out there, one simply can not make this claim because it has no basis. the evidence is very clear on that.