(05-09-2012 09:19 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:40 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:06 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  So more entrenchment. Nothing will get done in govt without moderates.

GOOD!!!
The less govt does the better.

If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

You have a problem with reading comprehension, don't you?

If you have politicians that are my way or the highway, then nothing will get done. There is no point in having a gov't if that is the case.

Blue dogs are dead. Socialist yellow dog Democrats don't want compromise. They want what I've worked for. Compromising with them is like me compromising with a robber on how much of my money I can keep. There is no give or take with Socialist Democrats.

(05-09-2012 09:16 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:40 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:06 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  So more entrenchment. Nothing will get done in govt without moderates.

GOOD!!!
The less govt does the better.

If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

are you retarded?

No, but you are.

FIFY

(05-09-2012 09:22 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 09:19 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:40 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  GOOD!!!
The less govt does the better.

If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

You have a problem with reading comprehension, don't you?

If you have politicians that are my way or the highway, then nothing will get done. There is no point in having a gov't if that is the case.

Blue dogs are dead. Socialist yellow dog Democrats don't want compromise. They want what I've worked for. Compromising with them is like me compromising with a robber on how much of my money I can keep. There is no give or take with Socialist Democrats.

Um Rebs, you need to lay off the meth.

(05-09-2012 09:22 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 09:19 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:40 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  GOOD!!!
The less govt does the better.

If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

You have a problem with reading comprehension, don't you?

If you have politicians that are my way or the highway, then nothing will get done. There is no point in having a gov't if that is the case.

Blue dogs are dead. Socialist yellow dog Democrats don't want compromise. They want what I've worked for. Compromising with them is like me compromising with a robber on how much of my money I can keep. There is no give or take with Socialist Democrats.

I see your time away hasn't helped your delusions.

You idiot libs can't scream "tax this!" and "tax that" and then get all butt-hurt when we call you what you are.

(05-09-2012 10:51 AM)Rebel Wrote:  You idiot libs can't scream "tax this!" and "tax that" and then get all butt-hurt when we call you what you are.

I think we should tax you more. That way we get more of our tax money back so we can use it on more worthwhile things than you.

(05-09-2012 10:55 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 10:51 AM)Rebel Wrote:  You idiot libs can't scream "tax this!" and "tax that" and then get all butt-hurt when we call you what you are.

I think we should tax you more. That way we get more of our tax money back so we can use it on more worthwhile things than you.

Anyone want to know why it's so easy to set up dictatorships and Banana Republics, with all the bells and whistles like political punishments as seen in Venezuela? Look at Robert's post. Maybe people like me should be outlawed, right N? Only leftist talk should be tolerated.

(05-09-2012 09:22 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 09:19 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 01:40 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  GOOD!!!
The less govt does the better.

If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

You have a problem with reading comprehension, don't you?

If you have politicians that are my way or the highway, then nothing will get done. There is no point in having a gov't if that is the case.

Blue dogs are dead. Socialist yellow dog Democrats don't want compromise. They want what I've worked for. Compromising with them is like me compromising with a robber on how much of my money I can keep. There is no give or take with Socialist Democrats.

These republicans that have been getting elected lately couldn't give a damn about you. Their interest lie in protecting multi-national corporations. Tea party and liberal democrats are a recipe for getting nothing done. Even mundane bills like naming national parks are going to be a problem.

(05-09-2012 11:30 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 09:22 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 09:19 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:58 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(05-09-2012 08:56 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  If you don't want Amerucan gov't then all of the states should succeed. There won't be less govt. There will be no govt eventually.

You have a problem with reading comprehension, don't you?

If you have politicians that are my way or the highway, then nothing will get done. There is no point in having a gov't if that is the case.

Blue dogs are dead. Socialist yellow dog Democrats don't want compromise. They want what I've worked for. Compromising with them is like me compromising with a robber on how much of my money I can keep. There is no give or take with Socialist Democrats.

These republicans that have been getting elected lately couldn't give a damn about you. Their interest lie in protecting multi-national corporations. Tea party and liberal democrats are a recipe for getting nothing done. Even mundane bills like naming national parks are going to be a problem.

Well, naming post offices will be a problem in the future since the rigthwingers want to eliminate it.

(05-09-2012 11:33 AM)RobertN Wrote:  Well, naming post offices will be a problem in the future since the rigthwingers want to eliminate it.

They don't want it eliminated, light brite, they want it streamlined back into the fuken black and if it means cutting a ton of pork, getting rid of redundant management positions, getting rid of the damn unions, so be it. Logic escapes you liberals. You really are emotionally-driven. Kinda like children.