(02-22-2012 11:47 AM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  

(02-22-2012 09:11 AM)CD11 Wrote:  

(02-21-2012 10:41 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(02-21-2012 09:30 PM)CD11 Wrote:  Gotta love the fake Georgetown fan calling Cincy "smaller-profile" considering Cincy beats Georgetown in almost every single historical category. All-time wins, Final Fours, Championships, take your pick.

I've never compared Georgetown to Cincy.

Never said you did. I compared them myself, and it's not that close. As a USF and Georgetown bandwagoner, you should really know your place. That was my point. Maybe don't call historically great programs "smaller-profile" when your alma mater doesn't even have a profile to begin with.

Maybe this is why you didn't get into Georgetown. You're not very good at logical reasoning.

I think what quo is saying is that Georgetown and Maryland are essentially on the same tier as programs, so it's unusual that Georgetown has taken a stance to refuse to play Maryland. In contrast, Kentucky and Indiana are among the bluest of the blue blood basketball programs while Ohio State is the largest athletic department in the country outside of Texas, so the fact that they aren't scheduling Cincinnati isn't that surprising. That doesn't have anything to do with Cincinnati's history or standing. It's just that saying that Kentucky or Indiana won't schedule you in basketball is the same as saying that Notre Dame won't schedule you in football - they're picky because they have the ability to very picky.

Yeah I wasn't talking about any of that at all in any of my posts so I don't know why you quoted me.

Let me just lay it out.

A USF alum/Georgetown bandwagoner calls Cincinnati "smaller-profile." USF barely even has a basketball program. It's the equivalent of a Toledo football fan calling Alabama "smaller-profile." Know your place in the pecking order and don't be disrespectful.