Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Usm_13 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 623
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #21
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
(10-17-2011 11:48 PM)BullsBEAST Wrote:  Considering the absolute worst case scenario for USF is ending up in C-USA with you, I like our options better than yours.

Considering noone is gonna vote USF back into CUSA..I was thinking your options were independant, or Sunbelt...At the end of the day all that matters to alot of us is on the field performance..you left with a losing record to USM..thats really all that needs to be said.
10-18-2011 12:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JHG722 Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,038
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Temple
Location: Wynnewood/Philly PA
Post: #22
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
They are so not phallus-y!
10-18-2011 01:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,874
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 176
I Root For: USF, UofH, AAC!
Location:
Post: #23
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
(10-17-2011 11:20 PM)Butterfly Wrote:  
(10-17-2011 11:17 PM)The Brown Bull Wrote:  Should suck???

What in the world is that supposed to mean?

It means a lot of people are upset at just how unfair this sport and the politics of it are becoming. In an ideal world we would all have equal footing and oppurtunity, our favorite teams would be given a chance and life would be nothing but suds, jugs and laughs.
Unfortunately, some people are too caught up in their feelings, it's a shame.

Regarding fairness... What's interesting to me with the current realignment, is that (IF the big east maintains it's AQ) a lot more schools just got a seat at the BCS table. Realignment means moveups. The B10 added 1, ACC added 2, SEC added 1 or 2. Those either directly or eventually migrate up from the BE, which then pulls up schools from the top non-AQ ranks. I'm sure a whole lot of people in Houston, Dallas, Orlando, etc. will be happy this all happened. And this process is not done. There will be a few more moves, and eventually everyone who 'should be' at BCS probably will be... Hard to believe, but after the dust settles, this may have been a very good thing.
10-18-2011 08:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GeminiShamrock Offline
In God I trust, for UH I root.
*

Posts: 4,523
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 184
I Root For: UH/the American
Location: Dayton, Texas, USA
Post: #24
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
(10-17-2011 11:13 PM)Brian Reading Wrote:  Sour grapes, much? Hey, Memphis fan, are you even aware of Houston's football legacy?

Evidently not. We finished in the Top 5 once or twice in the '70s. Hell, we even had a shot at the national championship at least once during that decade.

Again, obvious case of sour grapes is obvious.
10-21-2011 08:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bg151 Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #25
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
(10-17-2011 11:02 PM)OwlsExaminer Wrote:  The University of Houston has been RANKED in the Top 25 at some point during the regular season for 3 consecutive years. That's a damn good feather in the cap. They are currently #18 in the BCS rankings,

As for basketball, I direct you to this link about what's been going on lately.. Complete with VIDEO...


http://fivestarbasketball.com/articles/0...ma-remix-1

Since then, Houston has added a 6'10 center from nigeria (Olajuwon's Home) who blew up this summer avg. 12 blocks a game and now are close to landing one of the top PG in Texas who said Houston joining the BE is his reason for now considering UH.
(This post was last modified: 10-28-2011 09:27 PM by Bg151.)
10-28-2011 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NittanyKnight Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 384
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 19
I Root For: UCF/PennState
Location: Tampa
Post: #26
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
I would take Houston and SMU over Memphis football anyday. Memphis should send it's football team to D2 so they can be added as a bball only school to the BE. Memphis bball is what UCF hopes to become in the future.04-wine
(This post was last modified: 11-17-2011 04:18 PM by NittanyKnight.)
11-17-2011 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tnzazz Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,233
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 134
I Root For: Memphis Tigers!
Location: Franklin, TN
Post: #27
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
Can we all be friends?
02-13-2012 01:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
whiteman Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,093
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation: 22
I Root For: Houston
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Post: #28
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
no
02-21-2012 01:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tnzazz Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,233
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 134
I Root For: Memphis Tigers!
Location: Franklin, TN
Post: #29
RE: The fallacy of adding SMU and Houston
(02-21-2012 01:03 PM)whiteman Wrote:  no

Yo mama so fat.....
02-22-2012 10:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2014 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2014 MyBB Group.