(12-21-2011 12:08 PM)ivet Wrote:  

(12-21-2011 12:03 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(12-21-2011 11:55 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Buck I missed you. Your insults of ECU are way more subtle than everyone else. They just throw out butt hurt and u mad pics, but you go that extra mile to troll us. You actually appear to put in some effort in it, so glad to see you back keep up the good work.

You may find subtlety because there is no insult. I asked a question and have yet to hear a legitimate response. If ECU believes it has proven itself AQ worthy then why are ECU fans bombarding Big East administrators and fans rather than the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big XII or Pac 12?

I have wondered that myself and from numerous post I've come across, it is basically because the BE members are undeserving of their AQ status. That is to say the BE is the weakest of the AQs and ECU's facilities, record, support, etc... surpass at least half of the BE teams. That is the reason why they feel the need to release their hounds on the BE. But maybe they can elaborate on this a little more.

I don't really see why that would be hard to figure out. 3 of the 6 AQ leagues make zero sense from a geography standpoint. The only 3 that do are the SEC, ACC, and BE. Of those 3 it's always been quite obvious that the BE is the only one of those that's promoting non-AQ teams. There's a pecking order, and right now we are in the 7th spot and the BE is 6th. The only example of a team jumping straight from a non-AQ to one of the big 5 is Utah. Even TCU had to pitstop kinda in the BE before getting the B12 birth. The BE is where you look if your a non-AQ and want to move up.