(11-01-2010 03:32 PM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  Just so we dont get off track of this article...

1) It mentioned schools as "lead" candidates...we don't need to disect that. It also mentioned Villanova and Temple in the same breath, how does that work? Would they ask Temple as football only if Nova doesnt want to move up? Surely they arent talking about adding Temple in all sports AND still have Nova? As I said, you cant cherry pick what you are dissecting from the list of candidates.

2) It didnt mention TV markets or the BEN. Did it?

3) The part about the split, what is that? What does that mean? Where are they going with that?

Lets not get into a discussion about anything more than what the article listed. Buck started a bunch of crap AGAIN when he makes generalizations like "ECU doesnt have the ratings". It's a statement that is OFF-TOPIC. No TV was mentioned, No ratings were mentioned. Let's stay on topic.

1: I think that Temple is being mentioned just in case Villanova declines to join or they probably won't join.

2: I have no idea what the lack of TV or the BEN means. That's definitely open for assumptions.

3: We'll soon find out about the split part means. I highly doubt its going to happen.

As for Buck, just ignore him. I understand your frustrations with him. And I agree with you btw.