bearcatmark Wrote:Lets not turn this topic into a big fight though Ok... UC is seems to be getting better...lets be happy about that. Just thought id share

Sorry Mark, people just cant leave it alone... Tyman I am with you.

pobearman Wrote:Huggins will not be a great coach IMO until he wins a national championship and I hope he gets it. A very good coach but greatness is defined by championships.

Exactly! The great coaches hang more than CUSA banners. They get it done when it matters most.

jarr Wrote:

rath v2.0 Wrote:I'd say you are humiliating yourself but you lost all cred a long, long time ago. A year later, your take didn't age like wine...just sounds like whine.

Typical Rath. Never actually makes a point, just lame comments.

rath v2.0 Wrote:I think Mich More is Huggies new stud walk on. With him they'll win 28 games this year - one more than predominately the same squad won last year.

Does "predominately" mean losing their best player and top 2 rebounders. Since when did winning the NIT mean you were good anyways. Is all the NIT is good for is highlighting the fact that you didn't make the tournament. Remember your little crusade 2 years ago about not going to the NIT when UC was in it. I bet you'll have a change of heart when Mickget finally gets into the NIT after his 6 year rebuild job.

did you really just call him mickget? as in midget with his name in the word? dude, that's really lame. you can do better than that. at least if you're gonna try and insult the man, make an effort.

Jarr,

Your comment that UC had more talent than KSU last year was unfortunate.

Your comment this year that WVU has the least amount of talent out of all 16 BE teams is pure comedy.

You show up in one or two threads every couple of weeks when ever your Huggins' gaydar goes off and you inevitably make some top shelf comment my 5th grade son and his friends who follow basketball would taunt if they heard some goober on the bus mutter. Very knowledgable. Keep up the good work.