Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Thou Shalt Not Say Anything Negative about Blacks
Author Message
niuhuskie84 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,930
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 12
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #11
 
04-07-2007 06:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Motown Bronco Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,405
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 88
I Root For: WMU
Location: Metro Detroit
Post: #12
 
Count me as someone who thinks tattoos on a woman make her attractiveness drop like a rock. There's nothing worse than a woman's smooth, beautiful skin being trashed with some cartoonish Rorschach ink splatter. Vines, flowers, Japanese characters, etc, are just brutal eyesores.

It's like, I'd want to focus on her face, eyes and other physical features, as opposed to having my eyes inexplicably drawn to a ying-yang symbol above her breast. Blech.
04-08-2007 12:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Endzone2 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,297
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 2
I Root For: Miami Redhawks
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Post: #13
 
aTxTIGER Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:
Fanatical Wrote:EZtoo, I'm pretty sure everyone is once again flabergasted by your weak attempts to connect what you consider character flaws, this case being body art, with racial inferiority. We are all then blown away by your generalization of the black college athlete as the "street thug" solely because of tattoos, and then equating their appearance on college athletes (being sure to remind us that although athletes of other races have tattoos, the black athletes are to be singled out for blame) to a decline of the black community in America.

Oh, the tats on the blacks are body art. Is that it? Nothing else needs to be said about it?

Mind if I ask a few questions then?

Why didn't blacks have this "body art" when they started playing D1A sports en mass in the late 60's and early 70's?

Why don't most of the whites have this "body art"?

Why don't most of the general student population on campus have this "body art"? Yet most of the black D1A football and basketball players do have this "art". Why is that?

Can you answer those questions please?

im in trying to get into this argument, i just want to understand something....are you saying that if you have tattoos, then you are a thug? thats just what im getting from your message. you would be surprised how many people 18-30 have tattoos, endzone. of course, when you are showing your entire arm, they are more noticable than if you have your arms covered as in a normal business enviroment. and yes, white people have tattoos too. i am one of them and i have white collar job, dont sell drug, dont get in fights and dont commit crimes. please correct me if im wrong.

No, if you're a white guy with tats you're not necessarily a thug. But, the crime rate among blacks is 8.3 times greater than the crime rate among whites. So, if you you're a black with tats, then yes the chances are 8.3 times greater that you're a thug. In fact I ran into a white guy tonight here at the weekly who had tats all over his arms. Turned out to be a pretty nice guy from Rock Springs, Wyoming. The 4 white trash hillibillies making a lot of noise in the room next to me have tats. They also act like thugs to me.

But, I think a far greater percentage of the black players in D1A sports have tats than the white players. It's almost a given that if you're a black D1A ballplayer, that you're going to have tats all over your arms. I mean they aren't like the small tat that girls will get on the small of their back or their ankle, but these are tats that are there for show and there to be seen. They are like a part of their identity. I'm guessing that the girls from Rutgers had tats on their arms or Imus would not have even noticed them. IMHO they look even more hideous on a woman. When I saw the big tat on the shoulder of the woman in the room next to me, my first thought was that she was a hooker, and she very well may be one.

I think Imus is right in assessing that these girls look like hookers. The problem is that whenever a white guy (or black guy for that matter) says anything negative about a black man or women, all the politically correct forces from hell align themselves against that individual. If the Rutgers chickie players would have been white and a black shock jock would have said the white girls from Rutgers look like hos, no one would have batted an eye. I'm so sick of blacks and black leaders constantly feeding off of white guilt and manipulation. THESE GIRLS PROBABLY DO LOOK LIKE WHORES!! It's the truth. I've been with over 350 hookers, and a lot of them have the tats plastered everywhere.

We are not allowed to say anything negative about a black in our culture without those comments being labed as racist EVEN IF THEY ARE THE TRUTH. The political forces that be (and the media) are trying to constantly pound whites over the head with guilt about something that blacks don't even care about (and laugh about behind our backs) in order to maintain the status quo of affirmative action and special privledges and protections for blacks.
04-08-2007 12:26 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
*

Posts: 13,394
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 160
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #14
 
EZ-

Calling someone a thug on a basketball court I would shrug. It could mean aggresive defense. Pulling someone's shirt when their trying to drive by you. Overly aggresive boxing out. Playing hard and trying to win with shoves versus skill. I personnaly don't like this brand of basketball because it rewards athleticism over skill. Why tell a kid to work on their jump shot for an hour when they will be mugged on the court. I agree with some announcer's when they call it Thug basketball. I've heard some call it Big East basketball. There's a team in our District that we meet up against every year and they have the mentality that the ref can't call every foul so they play that way and are successful doing it.

But in this case it was far worse far far worse. Nappy headed ho's has a very different connotation and I can't believe that you would even try to defend that. If I was a parent of one of those girl's I would have to buy a coach ticket to New Mexico and deliver a first class ass kicking.
04-08-2007 08:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
niuhuskie84 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,930
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 12
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #15
 
Trying to reason with EZ is like trying to reason with a brick wall.
04-08-2007 12:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #16
 
niuhuskie84 Wrote:Trying to reason with EZ is like trying to reason with a brick wall.

I think the same can be said of Machiavelli/Dogger.
04-08-2007 06:00 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
*

Posts: 13,394
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 160
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #17
 
Reb,


Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks.
04-08-2007 06:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #18
 
Machiavelli Wrote:Reb,


Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks.

What kind of idiot would live in a glass house?
04-08-2007 06:55 PM
Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 30,161
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 644
I Root For: Fire 'Arry!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #19
 
Endzone2 Wrote:
aTxTIGER Wrote:
Endzone2 Wrote:
Fanatical Wrote:EZtoo, I'm pretty sure everyone is once again flabergasted by your weak attempts to connect what you consider character flaws, this case being body art, with racial inferiority. We are all then blown away by your generalization of the black college athlete as the "street thug" solely because of tattoos, and then equating their appearance on college athletes (being sure to remind us that although athletes of other races have tattoos, the black athletes are to be singled out for blame) to a decline of the black community in America.

Oh, the tats on the blacks are body art. Is that it? Nothing else needs to be said about it?

Mind if I ask a few questions then?

Why didn't blacks have this "body art" when they started playing D1A sports en mass in the late 60's and early 70's?

Why don't most of the whites have this "body art"?

Why don't most of the general student population on campus have this "body art"? Yet most of the black D1A football and basketball players do have this "art". Why is that?

Can you answer those questions please?

im in trying to get into this argument, i just want to understand something....are you saying that if you have tattoos, then you are a thug? thats just what im getting from your message. you would be surprised how many people 18-30 have tattoos, endzone. of course, when you are showing your entire arm, they are more noticable than if you have your arms covered as in a normal business enviroment. and yes, white people have tattoos too. i am one of them and i have white collar job, dont sell drug, dont get in fights and dont commit crimes. please correct me if im wrong.

No, if you're a white guy with tats you're not necessarily a thug. But, the crime rate among blacks is 8.3 times greater than the crime rate among whites. So, if you you're a black with tats, then yes the chances are 8.3 times greater that you're a thug. In fact I ran into a white guy tonight here at the weekly who had tats all over his arms. Turned out to be a pretty nice guy from Rock Springs, Wyoming. The 4 white trash hillibillies making a lot of noise in the room next to me have tats. They also act like thugs to me.

But, I think a far greater percentage of the black players in D1A sports have tats than the white players. It's almost a given that if you're a black D1A ballplayer, that you're going to have tats all over your arms. I mean they aren't like the small tat that girls will get on the small of their back or their ankle, but these are tats that are there for show and there to be seen. They are like a part of their identity. I'm guessing that the girls from Rutgers had tats on their arms or Imus would not have even noticed them. IMHO they look even more hideous on a woman. When I saw the big tat on the shoulder of the woman in the room next to me, my first thought was that she was a hooker, and she very well may be one.

I think Imus is right in assessing that these girls look like hookers. The problem is that whenever a white guy (or black guy for that matter) says anything negative about a black man or women, all the politically correct forces from hell align themselves against that individual. If the Rutgers chickie players would have been white and a black shock jock would have said the white girls from Rutgers look like hos, no one would have batted an eye. I'm so sick of blacks and black leaders constantly feeding off of white guilt and manipulation. THESE GIRLS PROBABLY DO LOOK LIKE WHORES!! It's the truth. I've been with over 350 hookers, and a lot of them have the tats plastered everywhere.

We are not allowed to say anything negative about a black in our culture without those comments being labed as racist EVEN IF THEY ARE THE TRUTH. The political forces that be (and the media) are trying to constantly pound whites over the head with guilt about something that blacks don't even care about (and laugh about behind our backs) in order to maintain the status quo of affirmative action and special privledges and protections for blacks.


wait a second, you just admitted that you've been with over 350 hookers and you are calling other people criminals? wow, pot meet kettle.
04-08-2007 08:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
aTxTIGER Offline
Carrot Dude Gave Me 10% Warning
*

Posts: 30,161
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 644
I Root For: Fire 'Arry!!!!!
Location: Memphis, TN

Donators
Post: #20
 
niuhuskie84 Wrote:Trying to reason with EZ is like trying to reason with a brick wall.


after 350 hookers, maybe the chlamydia has gone to EZ's brain.


wow, 350 hookers? just, wow.
04-08-2007 08:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2014 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2014 MyBB Group.