ECU to the Big East...it's a done deal...

BYU Board meeting Thursday.

So it's common sense you say?

In: Temple, Villanova, ECU, Memphis, Houston, USM

Not in: SMU, UCF, Boise St, BYU, AFA, Navy

(11-16-2011 05:08 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  So it's common sense you say?

In: Temple, Villanova, ECU, Memphis, Houston, USM

Not in: SMU, UCF, Boise St, BYU, AFA, Navy

Oh good lord. Please don't even mention us in the "list" - I've read enough slams against us to last a life time.

(11-16-2011 05:08 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  So it's common sense you say?

In: Temple, Villanova, ECU, Memphis, Houston, USM

Not in: SMU, UCF, Boise St, BYU, AFA, Navy

I guess that's common sense if you are not concerned with retaining the BCS bid.

You don't need an inside to see that the Big East expansion plan is probably DOA. Hell, an outside source (the Big 12) has been saying the same thing for the last couple of weeks.

And why was Blazr run off?

(11-16-2011 05:26 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  You don't need an inside to see that the Big East expansion plan is probably DOA. Hell, an outside source (the Big 12) has been saying the same thing for the last couple of weeks.

According to my sources the plan is still on only minus some obvious choices and with the addition of some not so obvious choices.

(11-16-2011 05:29 PM)UCFmike Wrote:  

(11-16-2011 05:26 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  You don't need an inside to see that the Big East expansion plan is probably DOA. Hell, an outside source (the Big 12) has been saying the same thing for the last couple of weeks.

According to my sources the plan is still on only minus some obvious choices and with the addition of some not so obvious choices.

That's why San Diego State is being increasingly mentioned as "in the mix."

You guys are too easy.

(11-16-2011 05:23 PM)UpStreamRedTeam Wrote:  

(11-16-2011 05:08 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  So it's common sense you say?

In: Temple, Villanova, ECU, Memphis, Houston, USM

Not in: SMU, UCF, Boise St, BYU, AFA, Navy

I guess that's common sense if you are not concerned with retaining the BCS bid.

Can you explain to the rest of us what exactly Rutgers does or has done to help the BE keep their BCS bid...4 top 25 finishes and 7 bowls games in a 100+ years of football seems kinda of lacking...if nothing else it screams "has no right to look down on anyone"