(01-29-2018 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-29-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-28-2018 10:17 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-26-2018 02:37 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I'm making fun of a billionaire with a bad face lift - oh the horror! I was also making fun of Reba McIntyre dressed up as Colonel Sanders. I've gotten to the point where I just point out the occasional absurdity instead of post after post of Trump bashing.
But I wonder if this thread gets the same response and views as the thread about Hillary shielding a friend/advisor from sexual misconduct allegations? I think both threads started about the same time. Kronke already is asking for Dems to disavow in that thread, but I don't see him here in this thread saying Wynn is a sleaze.

I think it would depend on whether Wynn was shielded or disavowed by republicans. He already resigned, which looks a lot like disavowed.

See, the issue is not a differentiation between Wynn's despicable behavior versus Hillary's friend/advisor's despicable behavior. It's the difference between republican reaction and Hillary's reaction to such behavior.

There's a caveat here though Owl, we have no way of knowing who knew about Wynn and for how long. Sure, now that it's public he quickly resigned, but.... Additionally, it's a much different climate now then it was even just 1 year ago.

In your words, we have no way of knowing. We don’t even know that the allegations are true at this point. With Hillary it continued after it was known. That’s a huge difference.

Known to her and people in house...or to the general public in a climate like the present?

All I'm saying.