bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,938
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3320
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: BBC article on parts of the Steele Dossier verified.
(07-17-2017 09:37 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (07-17-2017 08:58 AM)jaredf29 Wrote: (07-17-2017 08:07 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote: (07-16-2017 07:58 PM)jaredf29 Wrote: I've been a right leaning my entire life. I've either been a registered republican or a libertarian, and I'm absolutely disappointed and nonplused the levels of cognitive dissonance that republicans have displayed. Conservatives were upset at Benghazi, Clinton meeting AG, and the missing emails (all rightly so btw) ;but Russia meetings, FBI investigations, obstruction, abuses of power, violations of emoluments and the list goes on, they find excuses. I just don't understand I really don't.
Perhaps if there was some of that thar stuff they call evidence, ya know? Are you sure you lean right? Because your list looks like it was lifted off of HuffPo or the NYT or maye WashPo, talking points all.
Yes I'm on the right side of the spectrum. I'd call leaked emails, conversation transcripts, amd sworn testimony evidence. My moral compass doesn't point wherever the winning team tells me to point it.
They are evidence of something. They are not evidence of anything criminal.
Most of it is evidence of a lack of professionalism of government employees and mental illness on the part of Democrats.
|
|
07-17-2017 10:02 AM |
|