(07-30-2016 02:49 AM)00yyz Wrote:  

(07-30-2016 12:29 AM)NoDak Wrote:  

(07-29-2016 11:37 AM)jacksfan29 Wrote:  

(07-28-2016 09:52 PM)NoDak Wrote:  

(07-28-2016 09:39 PM)NoQuestion Wrote:  I don't get why it is so hard for you to understand that she is talking about Idaho.

Did the Big Ten talk expansion after they added Maryland and Rutgers? No. They talked divisions.

A commish never talks expansion when they already have that team. They talk divisions. This board knows that, but NDSU, SDSU, and Idaho posters are speaking a different language because they want to badly disprove what I have said.

The XDSU's posters passionately hate the idea of Big Sky expansion and the Idaho posters disbelieve it.

When Wichita St goes to a different FBS conference than the WAC, that will prove me wrong. There are no obvious expansion candidate for the Big Sky in the west. The only ones that are possible are in the Central Time Zone. Commish Williams expansion comments were not followed up in the least because most of the Big Sky reporters are clueless.

Right now Egriz is talking about the MWC taking them. They have to be FBS first.

http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic...3&start=25

The egriz discussion seems to not fit your description.

The BSC reporters are clueless and that's the reason your magical dream hasn't been exposed? Is that why you can't provide a link? I guess we all need to read between the lines.

Oh, and she is talking divisions. Split geographically or through a seeding process providing for more fair, and better competition. Her intent is to have such divisions in place when Idaho begins play.

It's plainly obvious you have an agenda and that you think through emotions not logic and disregard what is actually in print.

In the Idaho State Journal, Williams specifically talked about expansion separate from scheduling. That can't sink into your noggin because you are petrified of the idaho contractors report, which said USD could go FBS. That's your worst nightmare and you won't admit it.

She also said there is no maximum number that they are looking at. That plainly means expansion is being considered but still denial and de-Nile come from you.

Get SDSU to offer FCOA like USD did and drop some of your bloated sports like swimming and baseball, which are in pathetic facilities anyway with a 25 m pool, to afford FBS. You already have equestrian, which counts many female manure haulers, so Title IX should not be an issue.

Do you have any inside info??
Or are you basing it solely on Williams statement and the Idaho report??

Because that Idaho report also said NAU was a perspective team to join an FBS WAC and that aint happening...
In 2012 NAU spent 26 million to remodel the football facility and they reduced capicity from 15k to 10k at that time let alone the fact that their budget is over 80% subsudies right now...

Our former women's bball coach said on his retirement that UND would be in the WAC before the decades is over several years ago. We also have a football alum who made a fortune developing gold mines who is rumored to be donating a major remodel to the stadium on campus. Our master plan for athletic facilities show that stadium to be domed.

NAU was used because they didn't want to name any Southland or MVFC teams but USD. Naming USD is interesting as it really enraged the XDSU trolls, as they have shown here.