Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why?
Author Message
TodgeRodge Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,938
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
Post: #79
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why?
(03-09-2016 01:51 PM)LastMinuteman Wrote:  I enjoy schadenfreude at BC's expense, but let's be fair. They went to 2 of the first 4 ACC Championship Games. Miami has yet to make an appearance, and the ACC put that game to Florida on the assumption that it was going to be FSU vs. Miami every year. That was literally the whole point of raiding the Big East and torturing the conference landscape into the current contortion it's in today. The only thing they wanted from BC was that they wouldn't be the problem child of the league. They largely haven't been.

The problem at BC appears to be one of changing administrative priorities. Most if not all of us have been through bad administrations. It's a powerless feeling. The additional danger at BC, however, is they might get caught in the Fordham rut. It's usually easier to change the leadership at a public university than a private university, and when your president is a Catholic priest you've got an additional layer of complexity. What are you going to do if you're a booster, call the Pope to complain about the offense? (Mental images like that make me wish Alabama was a Catholic school, because that would totally happen.) Point is, changing inertia at BC could be a much more delicate and slow process than it would be elsewhere. This spiral might keep going. We'll see. Approving that practice facility is the first sign of life they've shown in awhile.

Alabama would switch to Lutheran...
03-09-2016 07:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - sfink16 - 03-05-2016, 06:54 PM
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - Pony94 - 03-05-2016, 08:37 PM
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - Pony94 - 03-05-2016, 08:38 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - JHG722 - 03-06-2016, 12:24 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-06-2016, 12:35 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - HuskyU - 03-06-2016, 06:59 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-06-2016, 03:19 PM
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - Eagle78 - 03-06-2016, 05:09 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - HuskyU - 03-06-2016, 05:13 PM
OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - tnzazz - 03-06-2016, 09:49 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - Chappy - 03-07-2016, 08:06 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-07-2016, 03:24 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-07-2016, 03:32 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-07-2016, 03:15 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-08-2016, 08:55 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-09-2016, 11:57 AM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - C2__ - 03-09-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: OT: And the ACC Took BC, Why? - TodgeRodge - 03-09-2016 07:25 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.