(10-17-2014 12:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-17-2014 10:38 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-16-2014 10:52 PM)john01992 Wrote:  no i'd say the slandering an entire demographic is an accurate statement. anyone who doesn't look at all the evidence and says there is a connection is engaging in slander. there simply is nothing of merit to that claim at this point in time.

The burden of proof lies with the accuser.

(10-16-2014 10:52 PM)john01992 Wrote:  LOL. if conservatives applied that to this scenario then this thread would never have been necessary.

Slander
1. (noun) the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation.

2. verb make false and damaging statements about (someone).

Again, this is a very simple request. Quote my slanderous statement.




Burden of Proof
1. the obligation to prove one's assertion.

Burden of Proof

You have repeated asserted that it is racist to ask the question of whether or not the influx of illegal immigrants is related to the outbreak of EV-D68. The burden of proof lies with you to prove that it is racist.

You have also accused me of slandering illegal immigrants. Again, the burden of proof lies with you. Simply cite my slanderous statement to prove your accusation, otherwise withdraw your accusation.

It's nearly impossible to have a serious discussion with someone when one person repeatedly uses words and concepts that they do not understand. In this case you fail to understand the concept of 'burden of proof' and the definition of slander. Come back when you wrap your head around those concepts.

by your own actions you have chosen to link D68 to them despite there being no evidence of that. that's slander

and while we are at it, why don't you look up the word liar.

http://floppingaces.net/2014/10/13/more-...n-imports/

Evidence. When you looked up the words slander and liar, you must have decided to use them. Or a subject like this is just too hard for you to understand. That's quite possible.