(09-11-2014 01:19 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-11-2014 01:15 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-11-2014 12:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-11-2014 12:49 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-11-2014 12:41 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  You're not the elected DA in Memphis...it's not your call.

I'm glad TV 'Judge Joe Brown' didn't win...it would look like Ferguson around here.

So you acknowledge that blacks were beating a white, who ran into the store to evade the black mob pounding on him, then finding another white victim to beat up outside, then the black that came to the white's aid, right? I don't have to be a DA to figure out what is right in front of my face. Surprisingly, you don't either.

That makes two whites, and one black. So where is the black guy they beat up? I didn't see him in the evidence either.

I agree with Republican Memphis DA, Amy Weirich, that a group of teens (that had a couple white people in it) attacking 1 white kid and 2 black people is not a racial hate crime.

I credit the MPD with 11 quick arrests, and the judge for holding them as "dangers to society"

So where is the other white guy they beat up, and where is the black guy they beat up, and where are the white mob goons? I'm not a line toer, I go by what I see in evidence so I couldn't care less what Republican Memphis DA said, I'm just looking for proof and I'll need you to provide it since I can't find it anywhere and you know all about it.

You don't make any decisions in Memphis, so there is no need to prove anything to you. The decision has been made already.

http://wreg.com/2014/09/09/kroger-flash-...ate-crime/

So you're clueless and going with whatever story shows this to be a random act of violence, evidence be damned. Got it. You just go on and lounge there, drink your fruit juice and eat your banana. We know where you stand on racial violence if it's not white on black.