(08-29-2014 04:04 PM)ArmoredUpKnight Wrote:  

(08-29-2014 03:59 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(08-29-2014 03:48 PM)wavefan12 Wrote:  

(08-29-2014 03:24 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  Theyre not even trying to hide their agenda at this point

The ESPN whining is insufferable. This may come as a shock, but not many people are interested in a Temple vs Vandy game. ESPN has one agenda $.

vandy was a 8 win sec, temple was a 2 win aac...it has nothing to do with interest, this is a story that can atleast get some imbetween time betwen the A&M story

it has not even got one headline...they gave the game a sorta headline but it was about vandys jersey situation but said absolutely nothing about the game

their is an aganda here , you are blind if you dont think so...its the nfl preseason and almost no major games have been played yet beside 2, vandy getting routed in the first non-con on the sec network while on the first game of their coach who was one of the most touted DC in Stanford a year ago.. might not be the biggest story but atleast deserves some kind of headline ..cbssports who had no stake in the game gave the game a headline of a temple rout

id bet a $100 bucks if vandy had won ..their would have been a headline that said.."mason shines in first game as vandy coach" or something like that

but i dont think the agenda is purely anti-aac tho...i think the agenda might be pro-sec and not making the SEC look bad at the launch of their billion dollar network..they played like 8 commercials of the sec dominance and being the best during the games yesterday..the vandy headline would be counter productive

Are you really upset about Temple story or is it the Kevin Sumlin spotlight?

i like sumlin and still support him and kingsbury ..so whatever point you are trying to make can just be thrown out the window

i was clearly praising kenny hill on the boards yesterday