(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:03 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:27 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:14 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 11:52 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Do you think White Supremacists should be condemned?

Yes, and they were...3 times. The problem as I see it, is you, Godzilla and your pals on the left pitched a world-class hissy fit when he had the temerity to also blast Antifa and BLM who were equally, if not more, at fault in CVille. That he did it twice and I still read crap about the timing and subject(s) of his condemnations is quite sickening. Especially since Godzilla is on record as condemning Antifa. Yet he doesn't like them getting blasted by the President.

I didn't pitch a hissy fit. I wasn't really concerned with what Trump said. I was more concerned with what happened. He made no mention of BLM or Antifa.

He also didn't mention Neo-Nazi's and KKK, which is why your side pitched their fit. They wanted the Neo-Nazi's and KKK to be condemned, and only the Neo Nazi's and KKK.

That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Look who the violent alt-left are denouncing (and will undoubtedly attack) in Boston.

Kekistan - people who just like memes, has absolutely nothing to do with race
Thin Blue Line - supporters of police, nothing to do with race
Infowars - media outlet, nothing to do with race

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:03 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:27 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:14 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  Yes, and they were...3 times. The problem as I see it, is you, Godzilla and your pals on the left pitched a world-class hissy fit when he had the temerity to also blast Antifa and BLM who were equally, if not more, at fault in CVille. That he did it twice and I still read crap about the timing and subject(s) of his condemnations is quite sickening. Especially since Godzilla is on record as condemning Antifa. Yet he doesn't like them getting blasted by the President.

I didn't pitch a hissy fit. I wasn't really concerned with what Trump said. I was more concerned with what happened. He made no mention of BLM or Antifa.

He also didn't mention Neo-Nazi's and KKK, which is why your side pitched their fit. They wanted the Neo-Nazi's and KKK to be condemned, and only the Neo Nazi's and KKK.

That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:03 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:27 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I didn't pitch a hissy fit. I wasn't really concerned with what Trump said. I was more concerned with what happened. He made no mention of BLM or Antifa.

He also didn't mention Neo-Nazi's and KKK, which is why your side pitched their fit. They wanted the Neo-Nazi's and KKK to be condemned, and only the Neo Nazi's and KKK.

That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:03 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  He also didn't mention Neo-Nazi's and KKK, which is why your side pitched their fit. They wanted the Neo-Nazi's and KKK to be condemned, and only the Neo Nazi's and KKK.

That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

Do other cons on this board agree?

(08-16-2017 12:34 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:32 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 12:28 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  Trump encouraged his supporters to beat up peaceful protesters at his rallies and they did

SAY WHAT?!?!?!?!?!

Even offered to pay their legal fees

Lining the streets and attacking anyone with a red hat on, pulling old men from their cars and beating them in the street, throwing eggs at women with Trump shirts on, barricading entrances to rallies, etc. Like a pack of wolves, they are peaceful only when they don't have the numbers, like most thugs.

(08-16-2017 05:42 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

Do other cons on this board agree?

This is not a rhetorical question. Condemn or agree.

(08-16-2017 11:24 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://youtu.be/8t-IT0fM-n0

Get your pole

Why do some of these people look like they are ready for mortal Kombat. lol. Some of the weirdest looking people on both sides.

(08-16-2017 06:34 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 11:24 AM)shere khan Wrote:  https://youtu.be/8t-IT0fM-n0

Get your pole

Why do some of these people look like they are ready for mortal Kombat. lol. Some of the weirdest looking people on both sides.

Bwahahahaha

(08-16-2017 06:25 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:42 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

Do other cons on this board agree?

This is not a rhetorical question. Condemn or agree.

We agree you are as goofy under this name as your other banned alias names.

(08-16-2017 06:45 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 06:25 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:42 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

Do other cons on this board agree?

This is not a rhetorical question. Condemn or agree.

We agree you are as goofy under this name as your other banned alias names.

I don't have other aliases. Do you agree that her murder was justified because of groups she was not apart of and if you protest white supremacist you should be killed because "you better be careful who you start ******* with"?

(08-16-2017 07:01 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 06:45 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 06:25 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:42 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

Do other cons on this board agree?

This is not a rhetorical question. Condemn or agree.

We agree you are as goofy under this name as your other banned alias names.

I don't have other aliases. Do you agree that her murder was justified because of groups she was not apart of and if you protest white supremacist you should be killed because "you better be careful who you start ******* with"?

as (almost) always, you whiffed the point....

I never write in 1st person unless it pertains to my specifics.....

it really helps when one either pays attention, asks questions, or keeps their yammer shut....

you are D) none of the above in this instance....

you can't troll me and expect a gummy bear swabbin' in return...I'll bury you every single time if'n ya try.....

you're only move was to report my post...........they're quite familiar with my style....

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:03 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  He also didn't mention Neo-Nazi's and KKK, which is why your side pitched their fit. They wanted the Neo-Nazi's and KKK to be condemned, and only the Neo Nazi's and KKK.

That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

Party of anger and hate (get it right), as your post exemplifies

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

thank you for flaggin' me as a racist......take a number with the other dippos....

there's zero malice in my speak.....how you interpret writ is an entire other issue....

is easily your problem......not mine (yet)

there is no questioning how I will defend when req'd....

if you have a problem with that????.....again, your problem....

(08-16-2017 07:49 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

thank you for flaggin' me as a racist......take a number with the other dippos....

there's zero malice in my speak.....how you interpret writ is an entire other issue....

is easily your problem......not mine (yet)

there is no questioning how I will defend when req'd....

if you have a problem with that????.....again, your problem....

Well, for one he has a potty mouth. Two he asks rat court questions. Three he can't control his emotional impulses.

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 01:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  That is because they were the one's responsible for the death.

He could have said there was violence on both sides but I hold the White Supremacists responsible for the death. I think people would have accepted that.

I don't recall however if that information was known or not at the time of the statement.

You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

You seem upset. What's wrong?

(08-16-2017 07:49 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 02:04 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  You would be, of course, very wrong. Antifa and BLM were just as responsible as those who actually ran that girl over. If it wasn't for the former, the latter likely doesn't kill that girl, but you can't admit that. Why?

Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

thank you for flaggin' me as a racist......take a number with the other dippos....

there's zero malice in my speak.....how you interpret writ is an entire other issue....

is easily your problem......not mine (yet)

there is no questioning how I will defend when req'd....

if you have a problem with that????.....again, your problem....

He seems triggered and I don't know why.

(08-16-2017 07:50 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 07:49 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 07:39 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:37 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 05:30 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  Wow.

he's not wrong....

you ******* better be careful who you start ******* with......

I would just like to say fučk both of you white supremacist apologist pieces of shīt. This is what this board has devolved into and your fellow con's silence when asked repeatedly if they agree speaks volumes. The gaul it takes to call others the party of hate and violence then turn around and say shīt like this is reprehensible.

thank you for flaggin' me as a racist......take a number with the other dippos....

there's zero malice in my speak.....how you interpret writ is an entire other issue....

is easily your problem......not mine (yet)

there is no questioning how I will defend when req'd....

if you have a problem with that????.....again, your problem....

Well, for one he has a potty mouth. Two he asks rat court questions. Three he can't control his emotional impulses.

is potty mouth a technical term???....or one that your decided was more inappropriate than actual violence???

it's not my problem you cannot handle a simple response to folks that are simply nothing more than behaving like ******* idiots....

the pen is always mightier....ya better bring game if'n ya wanna get picked instead of pickled...

I can do it either way....however, to be fair, let me 'xplain more clearly.....

I DON"T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS!

again....not my problem....

#whackjobber