(03-23-2016 10:00 PM)Claw Wrote:  I think Obama will throw the book at her. But she has to secure the nomination first in order to get rid of Bernie.

Then, with Bernie out of the way and Hillary on trial, he puts his handpicked candidate in at the convention. I am guessing that is the first American Indian Woman to run for President, but it could be someone else.

or michelle...yikes.

(03-23-2016 07:02 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(03-23-2016 11:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2016 11:15 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(03-23-2016 10:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-23-2016 10:15 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  It says something about Democratic voters that they are not ashamed that their party’s front-runner belongs in jail for exposing classified information.

And what does it say about you, seemingly ignoring a law professor with experience at Homeland Security telling you that she doesn't belong in jail, but yet you insist it anyway?

If I go out on the internet and post something from a law professor that shows she should be indicted and jailed, would that change your mind?

It might. And it'd be a refreshing change from the pseudo-law/security clearance experts that normally post here who continually insist they know everything.

(03-23-2016 11:15 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Hilary was appointed Secretary of State and she immediately set up a private email account and used it for official government business. Hilary’s non-secure email account was maintained by a mom-and-pop operation, not by the Federal government. Some of the email on her account contained Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmentalized Information.

None of this is debatable.

Additionally, it's universally understood that she exposed classified information to foreign intelligence services and not even you believe she didn't write, view and forward classified information via this non-secure email.

She deserves her day in court, of course. But the fact that Democrats ignore the above egregious flaunting of laws and best practices because it more important to elect a woman to the White House says something quite noxious about liberals. By claiming Hillary has done no wrong liberals are really signaling that being liberal is more important than the rule of law.

Run with that and the embarrassment it brings your party.

And nobody is ignoring anything. If it weren't' for this, she'd be a huge favorite in November and Bernie would have been cast aside months ago.

And finally, it's not my party. I'm not a Democrat.

Since you're a Bernie supporter, see if you can follow these breadcrumbs...Bernie is an avowed Socialist, who caucuses with the Democrats, who're deciding between Hillary and Bernie for the nomination, you support Bernie. So either you're a Democrat or a Socalist [sic]. Which is it?

No. Bernie is not a true Socialist. He's explained this many times. And no, I'm not either a D or an S. Like Bernie, I'm sort of a hybrid between the two. True Socialists basically want the government/community to take over production of everything in lieu of anything capitalist. Neither I nor Bernie want that.

As I've explained many times...I'm a liberal, so naturally I'm going to side with democratic principles for the most part. I just refuse to join their party (mainly because I'm opposed to two-party rule in America) because they are basically a bunch of political wimps.

(03-23-2016 10:01 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(03-23-2016 10:00 PM)Claw Wrote:  I think Obama will throw the book at her. But she has to secure the nomination first in order to get rid of Bernie.

Then, with Bernie out of the way and Hillary on trial, he puts his handpicked candidate in at the convention. I am guessing that is the first American Indian Woman to run for President, but it could be someone else.

or michelle...yikes.