CSNbbs
First Uranium One Indictment - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Kyra Memorial Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: First Uranium One Indictment (/thread-840137.html)



First Uranium One Indictment - rath v2.0 - 01-15-2018 09:08 AM

This news certainly got buried by the silliness du jour.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-president-maryland-based-transportation-company-indicted-11-counts-related-foreign


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - 200yrs2late - 01-15-2018 10:12 AM

"Buired", you mean ignored. Media is running from this like the plague.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-15-2018 10:31 AM

An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - TigerBlue4Ever - 01-15-2018 10:35 AM

(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - bullet - 01-15-2018 10:50 AM

(01-15-2018 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.

And if had been a Republican instead of the Clintons who were tainted by this, it would have gotten more coverage than any "shithole."


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-15-2018 11:00 AM

Since I don't follow wild ass conspiracies like you folks, perhaps you can explain what this has to do with Uranium One and/or Hillary and/or the Clinton Foundation?

Quote:According to the indictment, beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing until October 2014, Lambert conspired with others at “Transportation Corporation A” to make corrupt and fraudulent bribery and kickback payments to offshore bank accounts associated with shell companies, at the direction of, and for the benefit of, a Russian official, Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure improper business advantages and obtain and retain business with TENEX. In order to effectuate and conceal the corrupt and fraudulent bribe payments, Lambert and others allegedly caused fake invoices to be prepared, purportedly from TENEX to Transportation Corporation A, that described services that were never provided, and then Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to wire the corrupt payments for those purported services to shell companies in Latvia, Cyprus and Switzerland. Lambert and others also allegedly used code words like “lucky figures,” “LF,” “lucky numbers,” and “cake” to describe the payments in emails to the Russian official at his personal email account. The indictment also alleges that Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to overbill TENEX by building the cost of the corrupt payments into their invoices, and TENEX thus overpaid for Transportation Corporation A’s services.

In June 2015, Lambert’s former co-president, Daren Condrey, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and commit wire fraud, and Vadim Mikerin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering involving violations of the FCPA. Mikerin is currently serving a sentence of 48 months in prison and Condrey is awaiting sentencing. The indictment includes allegations against Lambert based on his role in effectuating the criminal scheme with Condrey, Mikerin, and others.

The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Thanks.

Seriously...I don't have any idea. 03-lol


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Attackcoog - 01-15-2018 04:00 PM

(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

lol...you mean like how Popolopolus (or whatever the irrelevant volunteer's name was) that got indicted was? Hey---CNN is a biased axe grinding joke. How can any sane person not be willing to admit that?


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - rath v2.0 - 01-15-2018 04:18 PM

Intellectual dishonesty is like a religious tenant of the left.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-15-2018 04:47 PM

(01-15-2018 04:00 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

lol...you mean like how Popolopolus (or whatever the irrelevant volunteer's name was) that got indicted was? Hey---CNN is a biased axe grinding joke. How can any sane person not be willing to admit that?

Keep sticking with the "he was just a coffee boy" defense. It worked so well the first time. 03-lmfao


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - TechRocks - 01-15-2018 05:01 PM

(01-15-2018 11:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Since I don't follow wild ass conspiracies like you folks, perhaps you can explain what this has to do with Uranium One and/or Hillary and/or the Clinton Foundation?

Quote:According to the indictment, beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing until October 2014, Lambert conspired with others at “Transportation Corporation A” to make corrupt and fraudulent bribery and kickback payments to offshore bank accounts associated with shell companies, at the direction of, and for the benefit of, a Russian official, Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure improper business advantages and obtain and retain business with TENEX. In order to effectuate and conceal the corrupt and fraudulent bribe payments, Lambert and others allegedly caused fake invoices to be prepared, purportedly from TENEX to Transportation Corporation A, that described services that were never provided, and then Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to wire the corrupt payments for those purported services to shell companies in Latvia, Cyprus and Switzerland. Lambert and others also allegedly used code words like “lucky figures,” “LF,” “lucky numbers,” and “cake” to describe the payments in emails to the Russian official at his personal email account. The indictment also alleges that Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to overbill TENEX by building the cost of the corrupt payments into their invoices, and TENEX thus overpaid for Transportation Corporation A’s services.

In June 2015, Lambert’s former co-president, Daren Condrey, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and commit wire fraud, and Vadim Mikerin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering involving violations of the FCPA. Mikerin is currently serving a sentence of 48 months in prison and Condrey is awaiting sentencing. The indictment includes allegations against Lambert based on his role in effectuating the criminal scheme with Condrey, Mikerin, and others.

The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Thanks.

Seriously...I don't have any idea. 03-lol

Probably as much to do with Hillary or the Clinton Foundation as the Manafort indictment has to do with collusion with the Ruskis.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Bull_Is_Back - 01-15-2018 06:05 PM

(01-15-2018 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.

But trump has a potty mouth....


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Tom in Lazybrook - 01-16-2018 12:37 AM

(01-15-2018 09:08 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  This news certainly got buried by the silliness du jour.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-president-maryland-based-transportation-company-indicted-11-counts-related-foreign

Ok, so someone in Maryland bribed a Russian businessperson in order to get the contract to ship the output of a mine.

Lots of businesspeople get caught bribing for contracts. And many companies have run afoul of the FCPA.

At least they found something with all the money they're spending in this stupid investigation.


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Attackcoog - 01-16-2018 03:11 AM

(01-15-2018 04:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 04:00 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

lol...you mean like how Popolopolus (or whatever the irrelevant volunteer's name was) that got indicted was? Hey---CNN is a biased axe grinding joke. How can any sane person not be willing to admit that?

Keep sticking with the "he was just a coffee boy" defense. It worked so well the first time. 03-lmfao

lol...I thought the Trump Russian connections went back decades. Odd that he needed the 20 year old volunteer copy boy to get him in touch with the real Russian power brokers. Wow, there's no sneaking anything past you and your cool looking tin foil hat. 03-banghead


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-16-2018 10:56 AM

(01-15-2018 05:01 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 11:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Since I don't follow wild ass conspiracies like you folks, perhaps you can explain what this has to do with Uranium One and/or Hillary and/or the Clinton Foundation?

Quote:According to the indictment, beginning at least as early as 2009 and continuing until October 2014, Lambert conspired with others at “Transportation Corporation A” to make corrupt and fraudulent bribery and kickback payments to offshore bank accounts associated with shell companies, at the direction of, and for the benefit of, a Russian official, Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure improper business advantages and obtain and retain business with TENEX. In order to effectuate and conceal the corrupt and fraudulent bribe payments, Lambert and others allegedly caused fake invoices to be prepared, purportedly from TENEX to Transportation Corporation A, that described services that were never provided, and then Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to wire the corrupt payments for those purported services to shell companies in Latvia, Cyprus and Switzerland. Lambert and others also allegedly used code words like “lucky figures,” “LF,” “lucky numbers,” and “cake” to describe the payments in emails to the Russian official at his personal email account. The indictment also alleges that Lambert and others caused Transportation Corporation A to overbill TENEX by building the cost of the corrupt payments into their invoices, and TENEX thus overpaid for Transportation Corporation A’s services.

In June 2015, Lambert’s former co-president, Daren Condrey, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and commit wire fraud, and Vadim Mikerin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering involving violations of the FCPA. Mikerin is currently serving a sentence of 48 months in prison and Condrey is awaiting sentencing. The indictment includes allegations against Lambert based on his role in effectuating the criminal scheme with Condrey, Mikerin, and others.

The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Thanks.

Seriously...I don't have any idea. 03-lol

Probably as much to do with Hillary or the Clinton Foundation as the Manafort indictment has to do with collusion with the Ruskis.

And an apple is not an orange, so...so what? Again, what does this have to do with anything other than an alleged crook being caught?


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-16-2018 10:58 AM

(01-15-2018 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.

What scandal?


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - TigerBlue4Ever - 01-16-2018 11:35 AM

(01-16-2018 10:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.

What scandal?

I might ask the same of your mind; what mind?


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - usmbacker - 01-16-2018 11:41 AM

Buckle up!!!


RE: First Uranium One Indictment - Redwingtom - 01-16-2018 12:27 PM

(01-16-2018 11:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-16-2018 10:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(01-15-2018 10:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  An indictment of Mark Lambert didn't make national news? Who'd have thunk it.

An indictment against someone involved in one of the biggest scandals of my lifetime is certainly newsworthy to those of us with a functioning mind.

What scandal?

I might ask the same of your mind; what mind?

Except that's a personal insult/attack. Again, what scandal?