+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: Rice (/forum-444.html)
+----- Thread: Boz does it again (/thread-836196.html)
Boz does it again - bobreinhold1 - 12-04-2017 11:59 PM
Chris kicked a 38 yard field goal on the final play of the game to give the Steelers a win over Cincinnati. He's now 28-31 on field goals for the year. In his last two games against the Bengals he was 11-11 setting an NFL record. He's now 13-13.
RE: Boz does it again - seniorowl - 12-05-2017 12:13 AM
BOZ! Freaking clutch
RE: Boz does it again - picrig - 12-05-2017 01:58 AM
He's been nails now for 3 years. Current career FG % is 88.2%. He doesn't quite have enough attempts to make the NFL career leaders lists (need 100 attempts), but 88.2% would put him as the 3rd most accurate kicker in NFL history (Dan Bailey, Justin Tucker are 1 and 2). We always knew his was good...might've spoiled us, though!
RE: Boz does it again - TJS_NYC - 12-05-2017 08:39 AM
He owns Cincy - pretty remarkable:
from a Pittsburgh paper --- "Boswell made three field goals against the Bengals. And for those counting – hint: it requires all of your fingers and toes – Boswell is 20 for 20 in field-goals attempts against the Bengals in his career. And that's just the regular season. Counting playoffs, he's 24 for 24."
RE: Boz does it again - Bailiff_Lingo_Bingo - 12-05-2017 10:03 AM
Love it. I still think the marketing folks should find a way to play up "Rice Football = Kicker U!!!"
RE: Boz does it again - Baconator - 12-05-2017 10:05 AM
Too bad he wasn't good enough to beat out Randy Bullock with the Texans. ROFL thanks a lot Bill O'Brien
I do think it's funny that both Boz and Fat Randy are considered to be Bengal-killing kickers. Although Bullock killed the Bengals concurrent with his employment, so maybe that doesn't count.
RE: Boz does it again - wiessguy - 12-05-2017 10:24 AM
What makes this more impressive is his home field is said to be one of the toughest places to kick due to its winds
RE: Boz does it again - OptimisticOwl - 12-05-2017 10:36 AM
(12-05-2017 10:03 AM)Bailiff_Lingo_Bingo Wrote: Love it. I still think the marketing folks should find a way to play up "Rice Football = Kicker U!!!"
Let's put Hambone on that project.
RE: Boz does it again - owl95 - 12-05-2017 11:29 AM
What makes this sad is that given the Texans kicking woes, we had Boz on the team twice and cut him!
RE: Boz does it again - Owl 69/70/75 - 12-05-2017 11:35 AM
What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
RE: Boz does it again - cr11owl - 12-05-2017 12:06 PM
(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
We just offered (yesterday) a top 20 kicker for 2018 according to twitter.
RE: Boz does it again - Pan95 - 12-05-2017 12:07 PM
(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
RE: Boz does it again - Owl 69/70/75 - 12-05-2017 12:14 PM
(12-05-2017 12:07 PM)Pan95 Wrote:(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Right before the half, game was still close, we have about third and 7 on roughly their 25. We throw an incomplete pass, so fourth down, but we hold on the play. Ordinarily SMU would decline and force the 42 yard FG attempt, but Boz is money and June doesn't want to give us 3, so he takes the penalty. Now the FG would be 52, and the normal play call would be for us to throw something short to get an easier field goal. But we know Boz is good out to 60, so we take the deep shot downfield. SMU is sitting at the 10-15 yard depth, because that is the normal call there. So we get open behind them and complete the pass down to around the 5 or so. Next play, we score the TD with about 30 seconds left. Having Boz on our side changed every call until the TD. I was sitting with Kent Rowald, and we both agreed that the threat of Boz got us that touchdown.
RE: Boz does it again - Hambone10 - 12-05-2017 01:16 PM
(12-05-2017 10:36 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:(12-05-2017 10:03 AM)Bailiff_Lingo_Bingo Wrote: Love it. I still think the marketing folks should find a way to play up "Rice Football = Kicker U!!!"
Let's put Hambone on that project.
I'm in!
RE: Boz does it again - Almadenmike - 12-05-2017 01:16 PM
(12-05-2017 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(12-05-2017 12:07 PM)Pan95 Wrote:(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Right before the half, game was still close, we have about third and 7 on roughly their 25. We throw an incomplete pass, so fourth down, but we hold on the play. Ordinarily SMU would decline and force the 42 yard FG attempt, but Boz is money and June doesn't want to give us 3, so he takes the penalty. Now the FG would be 52, and the normal play call would be for us to throw something short to get an easier field goal. But we know Boz is good out to 60, so we take the deep shot downfield. SMU is sitting at the 10-15 yard depth, because that is the normal call there. So we get open behind them and complete the pass down to around the 5 or so. Next play, we score the TD with about 30 seconds left. Having Boz on our side changed every call until the TD. I was sitting with Kent Rowald, and we both agreed that the threat of Boz got us that touchdown.
Here's the play-by-play of that wondrous drive:
Quote:1st and 10 at RICE 18
(1:56 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue pass complete to Vance McDonald for 12 yards to the Rice 30 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at RICE 30
(1:56 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue pass complete to Turner Petersen for 35 yards to the SMU 35 for a 1ST down.
1st and 10 at SMU 35
(1:30 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue pass incomplete to Jordan Taylor.
2nd and 10 at SMU 35
(1:20 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue rush for no gain to the SMU 35.
3rd and 10 at SMU 35
(0:40 - 2nd) RICE penalty 10 yard Holding on Nate Richards accepted.
3rd and 20 at SMU 45
(0:30 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue pass complete to Jordan Taylor for 38 yards to the SMU 7 for a 1ST down.
1st and Goal at SMU 7
(0:26 - 2nd) Timeout SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY, clock 0:26.
1st and Goal at SMU 7
(0:20 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue pass complete to Donte Moore for 7 yards for a TOUCHDOWN.
(0:20 - 2nd) Chris Boswell extra point GOOD.
RE: Boz does it again - I45owl - 12-05-2017 01:35 PM
(12-05-2017 01:16 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:(12-05-2017 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:Here's the play-by-play of that wondrous drive:(12-05-2017 12:07 PM)Pan95 Wrote:Right before the half, game was still close, we have about third and 7 on roughly their 25. We throw an incomplete pass, so fourth down, but we hold on the play. Ordinarily SMU would decline and force the 42 yard FG attempt, but Boz is money and June doesn't want to give us 3, so he takes the penalty. Now the FG would be 52, and the normal play call would be for us to throw something short to get an easier field goal. But we know Boz is good out to 60, so we take the deep shot downfield. SMU is sitting at the 10-15 yard depth, because that is the normal call there. So we get open behind them and complete the pass down to around the 5 or so. Next play, we score the TD with about 30 seconds left. Having Boz on our side changed every call until the TD. I was sitting with Kent Rowald, and we both agreed that the threat of Boz got us that touchdown.(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Quote:(1:20 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue rush for no gain to the SMU 35.
3rd and 10 at SMU 35
(0:40 - 2nd) RICE penalty 10 yard Holding on Nate Richards accepted.
3rd and 20 at SMU 45
That makes it - decline the call, and it is a 52 yard FG... accept it and hold Rice for no gain, it's a 62 yard FG.
It's a little bit different calculus (I think a coach accepts the penalty almost regardless of who the kicker is), but your conclusion is probably the same.
RE: Boz does it again - Almadenmike - 12-05-2017 02:21 PM
(12-05-2017 01:35 PM)I45owl Wrote:(12-05-2017 01:16 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:(12-05-2017 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:Here's the play-by-play of that wondrous drive:(12-05-2017 12:07 PM)Pan95 Wrote:Right before the half, game was still close, we have about third and 7 on roughly their 25. We throw an incomplete pass, so fourth down, but we hold on the play. Ordinarily SMU would decline and force the 42 yard FG attempt, but Boz is money and June doesn't want to give us 3, so he takes the penalty. Now the FG would be 52, and the normal play call would be for us to throw something short to get an easier field goal. But we know Boz is good out to 60, so we take the deep shot downfield. SMU is sitting at the 10-15 yard depth, because that is the normal call there. So we get open behind them and complete the pass down to around the 5 or so. Next play, we score the TD with about 30 seconds left. Having Boz on our side changed every call until the TD. I was sitting with Kent Rowald, and we both agreed that the threat of Boz got us that touchdown.(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Quote:(1:20 - 2nd) Taylor McHargue rush for no gain to the SMU 35.
3rd and 10 at SMU 35
(0:40 - 2nd) RICE penalty 10 yard Holding on Nate Richards accepted.
3rd and 20 at SMU 45
That makes it - decline the call, and it is a 52 yard FG... accept it and hold Rice for no gain, it's a 62 yard FG.
It's a little bit different calculus (I think a coach accepts the penalty almost regardless of who the kicker is), but your conclusion is probably the same.
Even without that possible FG, Boz made five that game ... from 56, 51, 43, 53 and 28 yards. Yep ... three were longer than 50 yards. :-)
RE: Boz does it again - WRCisforgotten79 - 12-05-2017 02:35 PM
Pittsburgh will have a 9th home game this season - when the Steelers play at NRG on Christmas Day, I predict that at least 60% (probably more) of the fans will be for Pittsburgh.
RE: Boz does it again - Pan95 - 12-05-2017 02:52 PM
(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
(12-05-2017 12:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:(12-05-2017 12:07 PM)Pan95 Wrote:(12-05-2017 11:35 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: What is also sad is that after seeing how Boz impacted games here, Bailiff did not go out and find another Boz to replace him.Care to elaborate? I wasn't at that game (assuming this was the 2012 season)
I've walked through a situation on here before where, against SMU just before the half, the threat of Boz got us a touchdown. That is the way to use a kicker, even when he doesn't have to kick.
Right before the half, game was still close, we have about third and 7 on roughly their 25. We throw an incomplete pass, so fourth down, but we hold on the play. Ordinarily SMU would decline and force the 42 yard FG attempt, but Boz is money and June doesn't want to give us 3, so he takes the penalty. Now the FG would be 52, and the normal play call would be for us to throw something short to get an easier field goal. But we know Boz is good out to 60, so we take the deep shot downfield. SMU is sitting at the 10-15 yard depth, because that is the normal call there. So we get open behind them and complete the pass down to around the 5 or so. Next play, we score the TD with about 30 seconds left. Having Boz on our side changed every call until the TD. I was sitting with Kent Rowald, and we both agreed that the threat of Boz got us that touchdown.
Awesome! Thank you for the recap!
RE: Boz does it again - Owl 69/70/75 - 12-05-2017 03:41 PM
So I was ten yards off, sorry about that. Memory is not what it used to be.
I think most coaches let us have the 52 yard try, but not with Boz. The gutsy call was the deep pass, but obviously we were comfortable giving him a swing at it from 62. What a weapon.